An Open Letter To ‘Science Feedback’ – Unethical Fact Checkers?
After more misleading and unscientific claims against our articles by Science Feedback that aims to remove our reporting on studies and cases of vaccine injuries from Facebook’s newsfeed, the attack on journalism continues. Science Feedback’s work is directly involved in keeping information from the public, written by independent journalists, that tells stories the mainstream media will not tell you when it comes to vaccinations.
Their tagline states: “Accurate information is the foundation of a functioning democracy.” But as per usual, who is deciding what is accurate information? Due to the actions of this company, our work is triggered on Facebook as ‘fake news’, we lose reach, impact and our ability to earn revenue. All because we explore a narrative the mainstream won’t explore or report on. So I decided to write a letter to the company being paid by Facebook to keep information from you. Because the average reader does not work in the field of journalism, they are likely not aware of just how impactful a company like this is in affecting public discourse.
They literally have the ability to act as the deciders of what is true or not, cut the reach and profits of an independent media website, and keep alternative perspectives from public discourse. Does this make sense to you? My letter to them is below. I will update you with how they respond. But they have NEVER responded to any of the emails we have sent them challenging their ratings of our content. Not once! But note, Science Feedback regularly attacks any person or company that credibly asks questions about vaccines and vaccine safety. —- Hi, I write to you because the disservice you are doing to the human population is beyond words. With regards to vaccine coverage, you attack articles questioning the safety of vaccines as if you are funded and guided by pharmaceutical giants themselves. Perhaps you are. With your manipulative unscientific approach and journalistic twists, you are taking content we produce and casting doubt over it by not addressing the actual content of our work but instead simply doing what Facebook has hired you to do: cast doubt of content that questions the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. Children are dying in the world, children are being injured in the world... from vaccines, and all we are doing as concerned citizens and researchers is listening to parents, the science and our hearts in seeking an honest and open discussion about vaccines and their safety. And still, you, along with other establishment mouthpieces continue to avoid the facts and instead use ridicule and one dimensional studies to avoid the harm that is being caused. I truly ask you to look into the video below, facts that come from VAERS itself, and tell me that 10% of the population is not worth stepping back and saying “maybe we should assess the risks of vaccines and be honest.” It is estimated that 7 – 10% of people cannot have penicillin and yet those allergic wear a bracelet so they are not harmed. Yet 10+% of children cannot have vaccines safely and yet your mandate is to hide and not address this fact. Please, for the sake of human health, be ethical and stop what you are doing in support of junk science that seeks to avoid real issues taking place. Years from now, people will look back and wonder why intelligent people didn’t stand up and do what was the right thing to do. What world do you want to live in? What do you want it to look like? Peace Joe Founder of Collective Evolution, the website you work to keep out of Facebook’s newsfeed because we tell stories people should know. Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network! It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, conscious shows and personal transformation guides. Click beelow to claim your 50% OFF discount using the code 'BF2019', and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anyw.
Read the full article at the original website
References: