For all other deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death. Have death rates been inflated? Why is there so much conflicting information out there about Covid-19? Is this due to a lack of transparency? Does the politicization of science have anything to do with it? Why is the only solution a vaccine? What Happened: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), out of all the deaths that have been labelled as a COVID-19 death in the United States so far, for 6% of them “COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned” and for 94% of the deaths, there were other causes and conditions in addition to COVID-19.
The CDC states that “for deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.” This is shown in “Table 3.” What does this mean? It means that for the majority of deaths that have been attributed to COVID-19, the new virus may not have been the cause of the death, perhaps it may have contributed to the deaths, or at least is suspected to have done so, but this remains unclear as there is no statement given. This doesn’t mean that those 94% did not die of covid or that covid did not contribute to their death. It’s been well documented that people with comorbidities are much more susceptible and these stats from the CDC further that point.
There have also been many claims around the internet that people who have died in car accidents and other causes have been marked as a Covid death if they test positive (Not confirmed anywhere) We saw this early on in the pandemic. For example, a study published in Italy shows that 99 percent of people who had died so far from COVID 19 at the time of the study had pre-existing medical conditions that made them more susceptible to death. You can access that and read more about it here. It’s important to note that this is something new, for example, we do not see people who die of a heart attack tested to see if they have the flu. What’s been happening here is that if someone dies of a heart-attack but tests positive for COVID-19, it’s also marked as a covid death. Whether or not covid contributed to these deaths, again, remains unclear.
There have been some eye-opening statements from health authorities all over the world that seem to have emphasized that some deaths that are clearly not a result of covid, but of something else, have again, also been marked as a covid death if the patient tested positive. This has been a common theme throughout the pandemic. For example, Dr. Ngozi Ezike, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, recently stated that, even if it’s clear one died of an alternative cause, their death will still be marked as a COVID death. If you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live and then you were also found to have COVID, that would be counted as COVID death, despite if you died of a clear alternative cause it’s still listed as a COVID death. So, everyone who is listed as a COVID death that doesn’t mean that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death. (source) You can read more about that here. Another example comes from Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Toronto Public Health tweeted in late June that “Individuals who have died with COVID-19, but not as a result of COVID-19, are included in the case counts for COVID-19 deaths in Toronto.” (source) You can read more about this story here.
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment announced a change to how it tallies coronavirus deaths amid complaints that it inflated numbers. Rep. Mark Baisley, asked asked 18th Judicial District Attorney George Brauchler to investigate whether the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) broke the law by classifying several deaths at a Centennial senior living facility as coronavirus deaths when they really weren’t the result of the coronavirus. As a result, a change in the way deaths were categorized took place. You can read more about that story here. Vittorio Sgarbi, Italian politician Mayor of Sutri, gave an emotional speech at a hearing on the 24th of April where he emphasized that the number of deaths in Italy due to COVID-19 are completely false and that the people are being lied to. He stated his belief that governments were doing this to exercise more control over the population. This sentiment echoes the thoughts of many notable people, like Dr. Ron Paul for example, and also NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden. It’s also important to mention the research and opinions of many health experts who have been emphasizing that the case-fatality rate of COVID-19 is very similar to a severe flu. For example, Ronald B. Brown, Ph.D., from the the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada says, based on his research, that the coronavirus fatality rates we were/are given represents “Worst Miscalculation in Human History.” You can read more about that story here. Dr. Brown added that CDC and WHO documents show that the case fatality rate for influenza was similar to the coronavirus, implying that the lockdowns were pointless. His paper questions why the 2017-2018 influenza season in the United States did not “receive the same intensive media coverage as COVID-19.” The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) recently published a report titled “Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.” According to them, the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%. You can read more about that here. John P. A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the infection fatality rate is close to 0 percent for people under the age of 45 years old, explaining how that number rises significantly for people who are older, as with most other respiratory viruses. You can read more about that and access that here. In fact, not long ago a study published by several academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggests that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza, you can read more about that and access the study here. If all of the deaths that have been attributed to COVID-19 that are not a result of it are included in these calculations, and if infection rates are much higher than the numbers say, which seems to be the general consensus in the scientific community, this would drive the infection fatality rate even lower than the numbers above. This is one of many reasons why so many doctors and scientists around the world have been emphasizing from the very beginning that lockdown measures and more and completely unnecessary, harmful, and don’t really make any sense. For example, More than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee” to do just this. You can read more about that story here. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history is also part of Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee mentioned above and has also expressed the same thing, multiple times early on in the pandemic all the way up to today. Implementation of the current draconian measures that are so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no. – Bhakdi. There are thousands of scientists and doctors all over the world sharing opinions, research, and data that seems to contradict what we’ve been given from organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) are being heavily censored, and in some cases ridiculed. A lot of the information presented in this article is never really presented by the mainstream media, and as a result the masses are usually beamed with a one-sided perception while these same networks simply ridicule and label any opposing information that threatens their narrative as a “conspiracy theory.” There is a lot of information out there when it comes to COVID-19, and there is a lot that’s confusing and seems to contradict itself. It can be difficult to know what exactly is going on, but one thing is for certain, information from credible sources that are separate from government health regulatory agencies and big health organizations should not be censored and ridiculed, but rather discussed and shared openly and transparently. We live in a world where big interests seem to dominate politics and science, another great reason why discussion should never really be censored. The public awakening to what happens behind the scenes in our world is a powerful and primary process in the overall evolution of humanity’s consciousness. As we expose and do away with a world built on separation, conflict, and ego, we awaken to a consciousness that wishes to create a world of unity, connection, and one where all life can thrive. Understanding what’s going on here, or at least attempting to through the process of critical thinking and questioning, is all part of the process. In an ideal world there would be complete transparency of all issues, but today we have a digital authoritarian “fact-checker” that seems to be patrolling the internet telling people what is and what isn’t instead of allowing people to make up their own minds. You are not stupid, and you have the ability to think for yourself! Don’t ever forget that.
Read the full article at the original website