As reviewed by comedian Jimmy Dore of "The Jimmy Dore Show" in the video above, the World Health Organization began drafting a global pandemic treaty in mid-2022, which would grant it the sole power to make decisions relating to global biosecurity, including but not limited to the implementation of a global vaccine passport/digital identity, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions and standardized medical care. As noted by Dore, "Then they can just shut your bank account down when you do something they don't like, like protesting." Indeed, in 2022, the Canadian government seized the bank accounts of people who had donated money to the trucker convoy, and this was basically a preview of the kind of power the WHO would have.
Treaty Members Will Surrender Their Sovereignty
Even if centralizing biosecurity were a good idea, which it's not, the WHO would not be at the top of the list of organizations to be charged with this task. In his monologue, Dore quotes my May 2022 article, " What You Need to Know About the WHO Pandemic Treaty ," which was republished by The Defender:
"As just one example, the WHO didn't publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborneuntil the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airbornewithin weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored earlyadvice about airborne transmission.So, it seems clear that the effort to now hand over more power to the WHO isabout something other than them being the most qualified to make healthdecisions that benefit and protect everyone. With this treaty in place, allmember nations will be subject to the WHO's dictates … even if the people haverejected such plans using local democratic processes."
In short, every country that signs onto the WHO's pandemic treaty will voluntarily give up its sovereignty and the bodily autonomy of all its citizens. Making matters worse, we aren't even told exactly who the people are who will make this decision, so we, the people, don't know who to contact to make our voices heard.1
How the Globalist Cabal Infiltrated Governments Worldwide
This is all happening outside the democratic process, and that's intentional. The globalist cabal realized they could not convince billions of people into giving up their rights and freedoms. Instead, they focused on installing their own people in key positions around the world, so they could then make decisions that benefited the cult. A key player in this global takeover plan is the World Economic Forum (WEF), founded in 1971. A great number of the installed globalists are graduates of the WEF's Forum of Young Global Leaders, (formerly the Global Leaders for Tomorrow school ), where they're indoctrinated in technocratic ideals such as transhumanism which, whether they realize it or not, is nothing but eugenics rebranded. Transhumanism, like eugenics, is about creating a superior race; in this case, a race augmented by and through technology rather than selective breeding. As of the end of 2022, the Young Global Leaders community had more than 1,400 members from 120 nations, and in addition to political leaders, alumni also include "civic and business innovators, entrepreneurs, technology pioneers, educators, activists, artists [and] journalists." The Young Global Leaders forum is not the only incubator of technocrats, but it's one of the most well-recognized. WEF founder Klaus Schwab has openly bragged about the number of Young Global Leaders alumni that have successfully infiltrated governments around the world, including Canada, where more than 80% of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's cabinet are former WEF students. Trudeau himself is also a Young Global Leader graduate. In a 2017 interview (video below), Schwab stated:
"This notion to integrate young leaders is part of the World Economic Forumsince many years … What we are really proud of now is young generationleaders like Prime Minister Trudeau … We penetrate the cabinets. I was at areception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half of his cabinet, or evenmore than half of his cabinet, are actually Young Global Leaders."234
The WEF's Takeover of the UN
The Young Global Leaders school was founded in 1992, the same year Agenda 21 was introduced. This makes sense, as they're part of the same plan. Agenda 21 is the actual action agenda for the United Nations' sustainable development plans, while the WEF trains propagandists and implementers. While the UN and WEF have clearly worked hand in hand since 1992, in June 2019, they signed a strategic partnership agreement to accelerate the implementation of the UN's 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by further strengthening collaboration and coordination between the two organizations.
Hundreds of Organizations Condemn WEF-UN Partnership
In a September 2019 open letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, more than 400 civil society organizations and 40 international networks condemned the partnership, calling it a "corporate capture of global governance," and called on Guterres to end it.
"We are very concerned that this WEF-UN partnership agreement will de-legitimize the United Nations and provide transnational corporationspreferential and deferential access to the UN System," the letter states."The UN system is already under a big threat from the US Government andthose who question a democratic multilateral world. However, thiscorporatization of the UN poses a much deeper long-term threat, as it willreduce public support for the UN system in the South and the North.It is our strong belief that this agreement is fundamentally at odds with the UNCharter and with intergovernmental decisions on sustainable development, theclimate emergency, and the eradication of poverty and hunger.This public-private partnership will permanently associate the UN withtransnational corporations, some of whose core essential activities have56
caused or worsened the social and environmental crises that the planet faces.This is a form of corporate capture.We know that agribusiness destroys biodiversity and sustainable and just foodsystems, oil and gas corporations endanger the world's climate, Big Pharmaweakens access to essential medications, extractive corporations leave lastingdamage to countries' ecologies and peoples, and arms manufacturers profitfrom local and regional wars as well as repression of social movements.All these sectors are significant actors within the World Economic Forum. Theprovisions of the strategic partnership effectively provide that corporate leaderswill become 'whisper advisors' to the heads of UN system departments, usingtheir private access to advocate market-based profit-making 'solutions' toglobal problems while undermining real solutions embedded in public interestand transparent democratic procedures …The UN's acceptance of this partnership agreement moves the world towardWEF's aspirations for multistakeholderism becoming the effective replacementof multilateralism.WEF in their 2010 The Global Redesign Initiative argued that the first steptoward their global governance vision is 'to redefine the international system asconstituting a wider, multifaceted system of global cooperation in whichintergovernmental legal frameworks and institutions are embedded as a core,but not the sole and sometimes not the most crucial, component.The goal was to weaken the role of states in global decision-making and toelevate the role of a new set of 'stakeholders', turning our multilateral systeminto a multistakeholder system, in which companies are part of the governingmechanisms.This would bring transnational corporations, selected civil societyrepresentatives, states and other non-state actors together to make globaldecisions, discarding or ignoring critical concerns around confiicts of interest,accountability and democracy."
The WEF Actively and Intentionally Undermines Democracy
In mid-January 2023, WEF members, Young Leaders alumni and other VIPs gathered in Davos, Switzerland, for their annual get-together. As reported by UnHerd columnist Thomas Fazi:
"Alongside heads of state from all over the world, the CEOs of Amazon,BlackRock, JPMorgan Chase, Pfizer and Moderna will gather, as will thePresident of the European Commission, the IMF's Managing Director, thesecretary general of Nato, the chiefs of the FBI and MI6, the publisher of TheNew York Times, and, of course, the event's infamous host — founder andchairman of the WEF, Klaus Schwab …Founded in 1971 … the WEF is 'committed to improving the state of the worldthrough public-private cooperation,' also known as multistakeholdergovernance.The idea is that global decision-making should not be left to governments andnation-states — as in the post-war multilateralist framework enshrined in theUnited Nations — but should involve a whole range of non-governmentstakeholders: civil society bodies, academic experts, media personalities and,most important, multinational corporations …While this may sound fairly benign, it neatly encapsulates the basic philosophyof globalism: insulating policy from democracy by transferring the decision-making process from the national and international level, where citizenstheoretically are able to exercise some degree of infiuence over policy, to thesupranational level, by placing a self-selected group of unelected,unaccountable 'stakeholders' — mainly corporations — in charge of global7
decisions concerning everything from energy and food production to the mediaand public health …[There] is little doubt as to which interests Schwab's brainchild is actuallypromoting and empowering: the WEF is itself mostly funded by around 1,000member companies … which include some of the world's biggest corporationsin oil (Saudi Aramco, Shell, Chevron, BP), food (Unilever, The Coca-ColaCompany, Nestlé), technology (Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple)and pharmaceuticals (AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna).The composition of the WEF's board is also very revealing, including LaurenceD. Fink, CEO of Blackrock, David M. Rubenstein, co-chairman of the CarlyleGroup, and Mark Schneider, CEO of Nestlé.There's no need to resort to conspiracy theories to posit that the WEF's agendais much more likely to be tailored to suit the interests of its funders and boardmembers — the world's ultra-wealthy and corporate elites — rather than to'improving the state of the world,' as the organization claims."
The Goal of the 0.0001% Is to Rule Over the Rest of Us
Considering how proud Schwab is of his WEF members, one wonders why the attendance list to his annual Davos meeting is confidential. Whatever the reason for that might be, The Dossier recently acquired a copy of that list. Attendees at the exclusive January 2023 meeting included FBI director Chris Wray, MI6 chief Richard Moore, Secretary-General of NATO Jens Stoltenberg, the CEOs of Amazon, BlackRock and Pfizer (just to name a few), Gates Foundation executives and Cybernetics School director Genevieve Bell. The publisher of The New York Times and CNN anchor Fareed Zakaria were also in attendance, as were Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a long list of other presidents, prime ministers, ministers, senators, House representatives, commissioners,8
governors, mayors, bankers, royalty, oficials from the UN and Red Cross, as well as military, customs and space agency oficials. The people gathering at this meeting, which is by invitation only, are among the ones deciding how the rest of us are going to live our lives, what rights we'll have, regardless of local constitutions, and how the world is to be run. The rest of us have no say in the matter.
[The WEF's] power is simply a manifestation of thepower of the 'superclass' it represents — a tiny groupamounting, according to researchers, to no more than6,000 or 7,000 people, or 0.0001% of the world'spopulation. ~ UnHerd
As noted by UnHerd:
"… there is no denying that the WEF wields immense power, which hascemented the rule of the transnational capitalist class to a degree never beforeseen in history.But it is important to recognize that its power is simply a manifestation of thepower of the 'superclass' it represents — a tiny group amounting, according toresearchers, to no more than 6,000 or 7,000 people, or 0.0001% of the world'spopulation, and yet more powerful than any social class the world has everknown …It was only a matter of time before these aspiring cosmocrats developed a toolthrough which to fully exercise their dominion over the lower classes — and theWEF proved to be the perfect vehicle to do so."
The Globalist Cult91011
One insider has described the WEF's Davos gathering as "a Ponzi scheme" and "a cult," according to investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger, who wrote about the WEF in a January 15, 2023, Substack post. Apparently, the WEF is getting concerned about the fact that more and more people are starting to realize what they're actually up to.
"The World Economic Forum … is fighting back against conspiracy theoristswho say it and its founder Klaus Schwab are seeking global domination througha 'great reset' aimed at stripping the masses of their private property, de-industrializing the economy, and making everybody eat bugs.''Own nothing, be happy' — you might have heard the phrase,' wrote WorldEconomic Forum (WEF) Managing Director Adrian Monck last August. 'It startedlife as a screenshot, culled from the Internet by an anonymous anti-semiticaccount on the image board 4chan …But what Monck claimed was inaccurate. The phrase, 'Own nothing, be happy,'hadn't originated on 4chan; it originated on WEF's website."
Indeed, for some reason, these globalists are continuously describing their plans in reports, white papers, on websites, in videos (such as the one above) and at meetings. Yet when people put the puzzle pieces together, they cry "conspiracy theory." The WEF's plan may rightly be called a conspiracy, but none of it is theoretical because they've described it in black and white. Schwab even published a book about The Great Reset that anyone can peruse. In the final analysis, what they're really objecting to and are trying to draw attention away from is the fact that people don't like their plan and are calling it for what it is — a global coup d'état, a power grab by cultists who are unsuited to rule because their ideology is based on eugenics, depopulation and undemocratic top-down authoritarianism. Even in the face of collapsing birth rates, the WEF still insists overpopulation is a dire threat.121314
So, to recap: The WEF has announced and delineated the cabal's intentions for a Great Reset, which will fundamentally change how we live and erase foundational human freedoms. Trained WEF leaders have and continue to infiltrate governments worldwide. Trained supporting actors are also spread across business, media, entertainment and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), where they help shape public opinion. WEF Young Global Leader graduate Bill Gates is the largest funder of the WHO, which is now trying to get member nations to surrender their sovereignty through a pandemic treaty. The WEF and Gates have prepared the ground for a biosecurity-based One World Government for several years. In 2017, Gates launched the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) at that year's WEF meeting in Davos. Then, in October 2019, just two months before the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic, the WEF and Gates cohosted Event 201, which featured a fictional outbreak of a novel coronavirus. The exercise focused solely on how to direct and control public discourse about the pandemic rather than how to ensure effective treatments would be discovered and shared. In late January 2020, CEPI met with Moderna to discuss plans for a COVID-19 "vaccine," and later that year, CEPI and the WHO jointly created the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) program to ensure everyone would have access to the forthcoming shots — a program that failed to achieve its intended goal, by the way. The WEF works in close collaboration with the UN, which laid the foundation for The Great Reset with its sustainable development goals. The strategic partnership agreement between the UN and the WEF is the oficial acceleration of the globalist takeover plan. In November 2019, the WEF also joined forces with the WHO "to accelerate progress in health and development" to deliver the global goals of the UN.
Billionaires Plotting How to Depopulate
As mentioned, one of the reasons I believe the 0.0001% are unfit to rule the world is because of their anti-human ideology. Billionaires have held many secret meetings over1516
the years to figure out the best way to depopulate. In a January 8, 2023, Substack article, the Naked Emperor describes the "Good Club," which first met in 2009. The meeting, which was funded and attended by Bill Gates, included George Soros, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Eli and Edythe Broad, Michael Bloomberg, Oprah Winfrey, Peter Peterson, Julian Robertson Jr., John and Tashia Morgridge, and Patty Stonesifer. The meeting was held at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, then-president of the Rockefeller University. Nurse is now the director of the Francis Crick Institute, which was founded by a eugenicist. Crick's intention behind the Institute was to rehabilitate eugenics and "make it respectable again." As recently as 1970, Crick stated that "evidence for the equality of different races did not really exist." That same year he also wrote that sterilization through bribery was the only answer to rid the world of people with poor genes. Depopulation and eugenics were also on the agenda for the 2009 "Good Club" meeting. Each participant was given 15 minutes to present their case, and while several issues were brought up, all agreed that depopulation was a priority. They also agreed that whatever strategy was employed it needed to be independent of government, as government agencies were deemed unable to head off the looming disaster of overpopulation. As noted by the Naked Emperor, "if all they were doing was planning on how to save the world, they would be transparent and encourage everyone to help them on their mission." But that's not what they're doing. Is that because their ideas might be considered abominable by the average person? Sure, it's easy to decree that people of a certain class don't deserve to live — if you're not in that class! Ask parents of autistic children if they would be willing to euthanize their kids, for example, and I'm sure you'd get an earful. Or ask people over 65 to submit to automatic17
euthanasia and see how many takers you get. People work their entire lives just to enjoy the leisure of that last decade or two.
The Rise of Anthropocene Anti-Humanism
The idea of billionaires plotting to get rid of other people, but not themselves or their own families, is repugnant to most. But it might be even worse than that. Remarkably, as reported by the Naked Emperor, we're now seeing the emergence of a cult that embraces the total annihilation of ALL mankind.
"The revolt against humanity is still new enough to appear outlandish, but it hasalready spread beyond the fringes of the intellectual world,"
"This is called Anthropocene anti-humanism, 'inspired by revulsion athumanity's destruction of the natural environment.' For all we know, thesebillionaires could be part of this cult and infiuencing policies based on theseviews.In the 21st century, Anthropocene anti-humanism offers a much more radicalresponse to a much deeper ecological crisis. It says that our self-destruction isnow inevitable, and that we should welcome it as a sentence we have justlypassed on ourselves.Some anti-humanist thinkers look forward to the extinction of our species, whileothers predict that even if some people survive the coming environmentalapocalypse, civilization as a whole is doomed. Like all truly radical movements,Anthropocene anti-humanism begins not with a political program but with aphilosophical idea …"
Is Anti-Humanism or Transhumanism Driving the Globalists?
Do the 0.0001% ascribe to anthropocene anti-humanism, or are they transhumanists at heart? As explained by the Naked Emperor:18
"Transhumanism, by contrast, glorifies some of the very things that anti-humanism decries — scientific and technological progress, the supremacy ofreason. But it believes that the only way forward for humanity is to create newforms of intelligent life that will no longer be Homo sapiens.Some transhumanists believe that genetic engineering and nanotechnology willallow us to alter our brains and bodies so profoundly that we will escape humanlimitations such as mortality and confinement to a physical body.Others await … the invention of artificial intelligence infinitely superior to ourown. These beings will demote humanity to the rank we assign to animals —unless they decide that their goals are better served by wiping us outcompletely."
Judging by the planned direction the WEF is taking us, I'm convinced transhumanist philosophy underpins its political agendas. Schwab also has not been shy about the WEF's transhumanist ideals. He even coined the term "Fourth Industrial Revolution" to describe the planned merger of man with machine. Such a merger, in turn, allows for the direct control of each individual from the outside. Just like you can remote control a computer, so would you be able to remote control an individual whose brain was connected to the cloud.
Technocracy Is Here
In 1975, Sen. Frank Church (video above) warned that the technological advancements of that time already posed a direct threat to the citizens of the United States, and that were a dictator to infiltrate or take control of the country, there would be no escape from the tyranny. Fast-forward to today, and his words are more than a little prescient. As noted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., "We now live in this abyss!" The question is, how do we get out of this abyss, which was intentionally created for us by the 0.0001%?19
I believe the only way out is by rejecting surveillance technologies such as Google and Google-based devices while simultaneously building parallel economies, industries and communities that operate outside of their control system. None of that is easy, but we have no other choice. If you accept their system, you accept enslavement.
Read the full article at the original website