Subscribe

Search Results

You can quote several words to match them as a full term:
"some text to search"
otherwise, the single words will be understood as distinct search terms.
ANY of the entered words would match

Bookmarks

From ... in Political Information Technology Literature Environmental Climate Change Artificial Intelligence —

UN Pact for the Future: Who are the likely contenders to be appointed as the UN’s “special envoy for future generations”?

One of the action points that selected attendees at the United Nations’ Summit of the Future adopted as part of the ‘Pact for the Future’ was for the UN to select a person as a “Special Envoy for Future Generations.”  The three top candidat

UN Pact for the Future: Who are the likely contenders to be appointed as the UN’s “special envoy for future generations”?

One of the action points that selected attendees at the United Nations’ Summit of the Future adopted as part of the ‘Pact for the Future’ was for the UN to select a person as a “Special Envoy for Future Generations.” 

The three top candidates have a leaning towards top-down management, high-tech solutions and draconian population control measures, Jacob Nordangård writes.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Background

At the ‘Summit of the Future’ in September 2024, attendees adopted the United Nations’ ‘Pact for the Future’ with its annexes: the ‘Declaration on Future Generations’ and the ‘Global Digital Compact’.  With these three documents, the United Nations (“UN”) is pushing for centralised global governance with itself at the helm.

As we noted in a previous article, the ‘Pact for the Future’ dilutes the paramount importance of human rights.  The ‘Declaration on Future Generations’ raises questions about who can legitimately represent the interests of hypothetical future generations. And the ‘Global Digital Compact’ is an attempt by the UN to place itself in the driver’s seat to manage and control the digital revolution for all nations.

The premise of the ‘Declaration on Future Generations’ is that our lives must be subjected to global diktats so as not to endanger the generations yet to be born – in other words, our lives will be controlled and restricted by the diktats of a small select group who will base their decisions on hypothetical scenarios that may or may not impact any number of unknown generations who live in unknown locations under unknown conditions.   It is simply a fortune telling scam.

 Further reading: UN Pact for the Future: All our lives will be dictated to by a selected UN envoy to represent generations not yet born

As well as guiding principles and commitments, the Declaration lists actions to be taken.  One such action is to appoint “a Special Envoy for Future Generations.”  Another is to select a small group of people to review progress made on its implementation:

32 . Recognising the important advisory and advocacy role that the United Nations should play with respect to future generations, we:

(a) Take note of the Secretary-General’s proposal to appoint a Special Envoy for Future Generations to support the implementation of this Declaration;

(b) Decide to convene an inclusive high-level plenary meeting of the General Assembly on future generations that will review the implementation of this Declaration during the eighty-third session of the General Assembly and provide updates on the actions taken to safeguard the needs and interests of future generations; …

Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact and Declaration on Future Generations, Annex II Declaration on Future Generations: Actions contained in the Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact and Declaration on Future Generations, Summit Of The Future Outcome Documents, September 2024, Pg. 56

In the following, Jacob Nordangård gives us some details on the three likely contenders for the UN’s “Special Envoy for Future Generations.”

Divination for the Future: Who will be tasked with gazing into the “Digital Crystal Ball” to Protect Future Generations?

By Jacob Nordangård

In the policy brief ‘To Think and Act for Future Generations’ the UN Secretary General proposed the appointment of a Special Envoy or Guardian for Future Generations, and convening a dedicated forum for future generations to “advance implementation” of the ‘Declaration for Future Generations’ (preferably in the now defunct Trusteeship Council).

However, the reception was lukewarm among UN Member States, resulting in a watered-down compromise at the ‘Summit of the Future’. The proposal for an Envoy was “noted” in the ‘Pact for the Future’, together with a decision to only convene a high level plenary meeting on future generations at the 83rd General Assembly.

But the powerful players behind the technocratic agenda don’t give up that easily. They know what they want to achieve.

In October 2024, UN Secretary General António Guterres announced at the Hamburg Sustainability Conference that he would soon appoint a “UN Envoy for Future Generations.” He reiterated this intention on April 26 at the ‘Pact for the Future Interactive Dialogue’.1

According to the policy brief, the Envoy will be “representing and advocating the interests of future generations” with the help of, what can be labelled as, modern-day divination techniques. This means:

Facilitating long-term thinking and better use of foresight and understanding of future risks, challenges and opportunities by the United Nations system, in support of Member States, leveraging the Futures Lab network and science advisory mechanism, among other resources.

Summit of the Future Policy Brief 1, To Think and Act for Future Generations To Think and Act for Future Generations, United Nations, March 2023, pg. 13

So, who will be selected for the difficult task of giving generations not yet born a voice in global decision-making? Who will gaze into the digital crystal ball, foretell future events, and save us from potential global shocks?

In an article, authored by three insiders closely involved with the UN futures agenda, and published by Pass Blue (a women-led nonprofit news company covering UN-US relations, supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York) a few potential candidates have been suggested.2

1. The first one on the list is former Irish President and chair of The Elders, Mary Robinson. She was one of the founding members of the Trilateral Commission, and chaired the Rockefeller-supported Climate Governance Commission, which advised to declare a “Planetary Emergency” and a Planetary Emergency Plan “for urgent, coordinated action” at the ‘Summit of the Future’. CGF advised a “system-wide approach to solving the climate crisis” with “top-down leadership.” Robinson, who received the David Rockefeller Bridging Leadership Award by members of the Rockefeller family in 2023, is also endorsing MEGA (a coalition of world federalists promoting Earth System Governance).

2. The second on the list is former Prime Minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern. She was selected WEF Young Global Leader in 2014, and was responsible for New Zealand’s draconian lockdown policies during the pandemic. Ardern declared a national state of emergency and said, “Every move you then make is a risk to someone else. That is how we must all collectively think.” In 2020, she also declared a national climate change emergency with the intent of “becoming a carbon-neutral Government by 2025” and the need to “measure, report and offset emissions.”3

3. The third on the list is the former Executive Secretary of UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), Christiana Figueres, a diplomat from Costa Rica and daughter of former President José Figueres Ferrer. Figueres is considered to be the architect behind the Paris Agreement (on climate change). In 2016, she was Costa Rica’s candidate for the position of UN Secretary General but failed to get enough support. Figueres, a member of The Rockefeller Foundation Economic Council on Planetary Health, is possibly the most scary character on the list. In 2016, when asked why people should care about climate change, she said in a firm tone: “They need to understand that we cannot EAT today at the cost of what other people will eat tomorrow. It is simple as that!”

Figueres believes in the miracles of the new emerging technologies and writes in her 2020 book ‘The Future We Choose, Surviving the Climate Crisis’:

Artificial intelligence (AI) supported by sensors (to gather data) and robotics (to automate physical activities) together with the network of smart devices known as the “internet of things” have huge potential to become our greatest allies in the fight for survival. But these very same technologies are also the ones that could destroy that better future. For example, autonomous self-driving electric vehicles could eliminate the need for unnecessary private ownership of vehicles, but on the downside, they could also allow unscrupulous governing bodies to track and control the movements of every citizen.4

Although she gives a clear warning of the downside, it might be a price we have to pay. You cannot make an omelette without breaking some eggs. As illustrated by the words of Ali Baba Group President J. Michael Evans at Davos in 2023:

We’re developing, through technology, an ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint. What does that mean? Where are they travelling, how are they travelling, what are they eating, what are they consuming on the platform.

It is obvious that these three women, proposed for the position as the Guardian of Future Generations, are about to open a literal Pandora’s box with the introduction of top-down management and draconian population control measures to “save the planet”. If some of them get appointed, we are in deep trouble. As the recently de-throned WEF-chairman Klaus Schwab said in 2023: “… who masters those technologies, in some way, will be the master of the world.”

Other names mentioned as possible Envoys in the article is the Youth Climate Champion for COP28 and Rhodes Scholar, Shamma Al Mazrui, from the United Arab Emirates; Sophie Howe, former Future Generations commissioner for Wales; and, Sahle-Work Zewde, former President of Ethiopia and the Secretary-General’s special representative to the African Union.

Notes:

About the Author

Jacob Nordangård is a Swedish independent researcher and author who has studied and written about the complexity of world politics, world governance, and problem and solution creation.  He has written five books about the global agenda and powerplay.  At the end of 2019, he published a book titled ‘Rockefeller: Controlling the Game’.  The second edition of his book ‘Temple of Solomon’is now available for preorder.

Featured image: Mary Robinson (left), source BBC.  Jacinda Ardern (middle), source India Times. Christiana Figueres (right), source The Guardian.

The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…

Can you please help power The Expose’s hosest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Governmenrt
to publish lies and propagandas on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in ourt efforts to bring
you honest, relisble, investagative journslism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…

Please just choose your preferred
method to show your support…

Read the full article at the original website

References:

Related content

Subscribe to The Article Feed

Don’t miss out on the latest articles. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only articles.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe