2 Year Study Supports World Trade Centre 7 Brought Down Via Controlled Demolition

Tomorrow marks the 16th anniversary of 9/11.A day that can be painful and emotional for some and reflective for almost all.

. It wasn’t many years after the towers came down that day that speculation began to arise around how it happened and who actually did it. Why? Simply because the official story did not make sense. We’re almost 16 years after 9/11 and the information is out in the plenty as to how the official story is in fact false and much speculation has been put into what happened, so we won’t spend too much time on that. What I do want to focus on is something that is likely one of the best resources for helping to awaken others to the facts of what really happened that day. If you are reading this it is likely you already have your suspicions or know that the official story is false, but perhaps are looking for more tools to show others the truth, this is precisely what the interview below will serve well as. This year I decided to reach out to Richard Gage to chat about the latest findings that support a need for a re-investigation into 9/11. Richard Gage, AIA, is a San Francisco Bay Area architect with 28 years experience. He is a member of the American Institute of Architects, and the founder and CEO of Architects Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Richard has had great success in presenting a scientific and logical case to support the fact that the official story around 9/11 is false and has attracted more than 2,900 architects and engineers with verified academic degrees, and in most cases professional licenses, to sign the petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of World Trade Center Towers 1, 2, and 7. AE911Truth has cited overwhelming evidence that the towers, including building 7, were in fact destroyed by controlled demolition. Now, new research conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks has confirmed that the official NIST explanation surrounding how the WTC7 building fell is completely false. NIST claims the building fell due to fires and this new study remodelled and recreated the entire day’s events around building 7 and proved very eloquently that the explanation is impossible and that the only logical and physical explanation is via a controlled demolition. The study took place over two years and cost about $300,000 to perform. Leory Hulsey Ph.D., P. E., S.E., was the lead researcher on the study. He is the civil and environmental engineering department chair at the University of Alaska Fairbanks and well recognized in his field. He made a presentation of the findings of the study live on September 6, 2017 at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. It included the detailed findings and conclusions he and his team found as well as the next steps for the study which included peer review as well as an open period for feedback and criticism. Below is our interview with Richard Gage about these new findings and more. You can watch this FULL INTERVIEW in our Explorer Lounge tomorrow. You can watch Leroy Hulsey’s full presentation here. Related Article: 16 Years Later People Are Still Waking Up To These Facts About 9/11 .

Read the full article at the original website


  • Website