22 Out Of 25 Popular Burger Chains Just Failed Their Antibiotic Use Report
A recent study was done examining how well top fast food chains actually implemented their antibiotic use policies in their beef.22 of 25 failed including McDonald's, Sonic, Burger King and In-N-Out.
. Do you still eat fast food? If so, why do you find yourself doing so? What healthier choices can be made instead? If we want to see a healthier world, population and animal kingdom, we have to choose what we support more wisely.
The modern-day food industry seems to pay no attention to health. Thankfully, global consciousness is shifting in several ways including how we live as humans, view our health, our economy, education, politics, and the environment. You could say that humanity is going through one MASSIVE change. Today, billions of animals in the United States alone are raised, tortured, and slaughtered for human consumption. This reckless production and consumption, in turn, has created enormous environmental and health problems that continue to accelerate. That being said, awareness on this issue (food) in particular, has come along way. We are seeing changes in the food guide, a shift towards plant-based diets, and more corporations catering to new choices people are making around food and health. This is a good thing! One common trend helping to create change is the continues ‘bad press’ unhealthy players in the food industry are getting.
The latest news to come out regarding food quality within fast food comes from a report recently released by six major consumer and environmental groups.
They graded America’s 25 largest burger chains and their use of antibiotics in their beef supply. 22 popular fast food restaurants completely failed, including giants like McDonald’s, Burger King, Sonic and In-N-Out. The evaluation looked at each chain’s antibiotic use policies and whether these policies were truly implemented in their product.
They also examined how transparent the chains were with their antibiotic use. Antibiotics given to farm animals can lead to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, among other things. This is actually one of the top threats to global public health, which is exemplified by the fact that each year, more than 2 million Americans alone suffer from these infections. In September 1999, Albrecht and Schutte published “Homeopathy Versus Antibiotics in Metaphylaxis of Infectious Diseases: A Clinical Study in Pig Fattening and Its Significance to Consumers” in Alternative Therapies.
The study compared outcomes for four randomly assigned groups of pigs that were given placebo, homeopathic treatment, a standard blend of antibiotics and other conventional drugs in a routine low prophylactic dose, or conventional drugs in a high therapeutic dose.
There were 1440 pigs involved in the study, which took place at an intensive livestock farm in Germany.
The primary outcome measured was the incidence of respiratory disease, a common problem for pigs on such farms.
The results were astounding. Homeopathic treatment was far superior to prophylactic doses of antibiotics in preventing respiratory disease.
The prophylactic antibiotic treatment made it only 11 percent less likely (than placebo) that the pigs would become sick. But homeopathic remedies made it 40 percent less likely. When the antibiotics were raised to therapeutic levels, meaning a level that is only given when people or an animal was sick, it became 70 percent less likely that the pigs would become diseased.
The significance of this is that homeopathic treatment on animals would already be better than routine antibiotic treatment. When an animal is actually sick, the farmer would then have the choice to increase homeopathic or use a legitimately high-level dose of antibiotics. This, significantly less cost and significantly fewer antibiotics in meat. Simple, avoid fast food.
There are many out there who seem to believe that people will always consume this food, but we fail to recognize that it’s not just our choice.
The “food” these corporations offer is highly addictive to people, and that’s done on purpose. If we can connect with caring about our health, quality of life and well-being of animals and the planet, these are places you must steer away from. In general, eating meat does not support the health and wellbeing of us nor animals, but this is a choice we each make. Recommended Articles A Native American Perspective On Veganism Plant-Based Protein VS. Protein From Meat: Which One Is Better For You? Doctor Explains How Humans Have A “Strict” Vegan Physiology Vegan Activist James Aspey Beautifully Shows How To Consciously Inform People 9 Things That Happen When You Stop Eating Meat Internal Medicine Physician Shares What Happens To Your Body When You Stop Eating Meat Animals – Why Do We Love One But Eat The Other? The Heart Disease Rates of Meat-Eaters Versus Vegetarians & Vegans Were Those Who Roamed The Earth Before US Nearly All Vegetarian? .
Read the full article at the original website
