From ... in Social issues — Mar 5, 2024

Five Days of Reiner Fuellmich Trial Update: Court Hears Corona Committee Colleagues “Set Traps” in “Manhunt” Leading to His Arrest.

The Corona Committee, chaired by lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer has been outstanding for the educational work they shared worldwide particularly during the plandemic period from 2020-2022. In October 2023 Dr Reiner Fuellmich the face of the Corona Committee investigations was arrested and has now attended five trial days while remaining in custody in a Göttingen jail accused of embezzlement. According to a citizen journalist, Daniela Goeken, who has observed all trial days, there has been a “manhunt” aided by his Corona Committee colleagues and she says that the arrest of Reiner Fuellmich is a “conspiracy, a concerted action by many people to condemn him to inactivity.”

The Expose Updates.

Since his arrest the Expose has provided updates on Dr Fuellmich’s situation as requested by many of our readers. This particular update is pretty large, as I have tried to include as much as I can find about Dr Fuellmich, focusing mainly on the trial (which is continuing). Included is the collected and collated files from the trial observations written by Jiota for ICIC. Law, a summary of Day 5 of the trial from Reiner’s lawyer, Katja Woermer, an interview with Reiner Fuellmich with Ruediger Lenz on Apolut, also a video link to an address from Reiner, and finally a message from his wife Inka. Obviously readerswill be able to pick and choose which parts they would like to read or listen to if not all of it.

From Citizen Journalist Daniela Goeken

First I have taken excerpts from the court trial observations from citizen Journalist Daniela Goeken who has learned from her attendance at the trials that emails have revealed ex Corona Committee colleagues had secretly worked together with the prosecution for over a year and were giving him a number of tips on where, how and when Dr Fuellmich could be arrested.

“They did not shy away from luring him somewhere, setting traps for him, inviting him to events just to get the opportunity to intercept him. Because apparently it was not possible to arrest the accused legally, as he was in a non-European country and there was no international criminal warrant.” says Daniela who asks “How can this kind of “manhunt” happen in a civilized country like Germany? Why are complainants, who are actually quite normal citizens, allowed to actively help arrest and imprison the person they have reported?” “

Let us remember” she says “the persecuted and accused was not a serious criminal, he was not a violent bank robber and certainly not a serial killer. In fact, no criminal charges were even necessary, as it was a civil matter. Normally. In normal times. Under normal circumstances. But here the matter was somewhat different, the accused seems to have been of particular interest to the authorities. Why that was the case remains to be seen.”

Promises to Repay the Money

The “crime” Reiner Fuellmich is accused of is the embezzlement of money which was taken from the Corona Committee’s account for security purposes but was not returned and although he had always pointed out that he could only repay the money once his property had been sold.

What also particularly concerns the citizen journalist, is that nobody, notices that the criminal complaint was signed on September 2, 2022 was filed BEFORE any actual “crime” was committed. “Has this ever happened before in the history of justice, a criminal being charged purely as a precaution before he could do anything wrong?” she asks.

However, Dr. Fuellmich never got the chance to do so because “the complainants managed to have the money from the sale of the house transferred to one of their own accounts,” according to Daniela. She says “Imagine that for a moment, People file a criminal complaint “as a precaution” and then themselves ensure that the accused has no choice but to actually commit the “crime”

The money Dr. Fuellmich is accused of embezzling is in the account of Marcel Templin, one of the complainants, says Daniela who believes that the Corona Committee including Viviane Fischer, Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer could contact Marcel Templin directly and could easily return it to where it belongs. “Is this even about money, or is there something completely different behind it?”she asks.

Viviane Fischer Testimony

For the citizen journalist Daniela, “the confused stories” of witness Viviane Fischer filled almost two complete days of the trial, but, for her it still remains the very simple story that a man took 700,000 euros from the Corona Committee’s donation account, kept it safe from the state, and was unable to repay the money because it was taken from him by the complainants themselves.

During the testimony of Viviane Fischer which took place in both the fourth and fifth day of the trial, she made strong accusations against Reiner Fuellmich that he had personally enriched himself with the Corona Committee’s donations and spent the money for his own purposes. As a result, the committee had become practically unable to work and the donors had been defrauded. She goes on to explain at length that the statutes stipulate that none of the employees should be paid for their work.

According to Daniela “The judge constructs his questioning very well” He allowed Fischer to explain what exactly she means by the term “liquidity reserve”, which apparently she often uses and whether she had agreed with the defendant exactly how the money that had been withdrawn and was to be kept safe was to be used. Fischer affirms several times that it was always clear that this money should have been available at all times in case the Corona Committee’s account was seized.

She also states that she would never have agreed to the defendant putting the money he took into a property.

The judge went on to project a chat history onto the wall where it could be read that the defendant once asked the witness: “And what about your 100,000 euros? Are they gone already?” (He meant the money taken for security purposes) To which the witness replied in the chat: “Yes, they’re already gone.”

“Hhm,” says the judge thoughtfully, “it almost looks like you’ve used up this money?” Daniela writes and “The room is very quiet. Everyone is eager to hear what the witness has to say. The defendant in particular looks at her intensely. You can clearly tell that the witness has been thrown off balance. After a brief moment in which she apparently has to regroup, she begins to make verbose statements. But I think everyone in the room realizes that these are just excuses.“

According to Daniela, “everyone watching the Corona Committee has heard that she has separated from her husband and cannot have been as financially blessed at the time in question as she now claims.”

Fischer had stated that the money she took from the Corona Committee was always available, as her husband (note from Daniela: her ex-husband at the time) had set up a securities deposit account. Daniela opines “Personally, I would be very surprised if her husband had still been supporting her financially at that time, as she had already left him a long time ago for someone else. And if she was living in such good financial circumstances after the separation, why had she written to the defendant in a chat that she needed money to pay her health insurance premium?“

After the confrontation with the mysterious chat history, Daniela feels that the story the accusers are telling, “which seems to be largely a pack of lies, is slowly starting to fall apart.” However, it bothers her why there are such efforts to get hold of money that the plaintiffs have apparently already brought under their control?

“They were apparently never interested in returning the money taken to the Corona Committee. If they wanted to use it for investigative work, they could have paid the money back to the committee long ago, as it is in one of their own accounts.”

“We are faced with a puzzle. But what we can see is that it is a conspiracy. It is a concerted action by many people that has ultimately led to the most active member of a small community of truth-seekers, namely the one who has made contacts worldwide and initiated actions, now being condemned to absolute inactivity and completely powerless in a high-security prison and being treated like a serious criminal. We would have expected such an action from the “other side”, not from former friends and colleagues, don’t you think?”

“Now, of course, everyone will ask me what I think the “other side” is. Well, I have an answer to that, and I’m not going to hide it: It is one hundred percent certain that they are people, probably even entire organizations, for whom the work for the truth movement, which the accused has done in an exemplary manner, is a thorn in their side, a huge thorn.”

The full update from Daniela Goeken can be found on the Truth Summit substack

The “Money for Nothing” Interview.

Ruediger Lenz with Reiner Fuellmich on Apolut.

Following day three of the trial, editor of Apolut Rüdiger Lenz, interviewed Dr Fuellmich from the Göttingen prison where he explains that lawyer, Justus Hoffmann, wrote the criminal complaint, as he stated in court, and Antonia Fischer and Marcel Templin, wrote a criminal complaint on September 2, 2002. According to Dr Fuellmich, this criminal complaint was the reason and the only basis for investigations by the Göttingen public prosecutor’s office, which took this criminal complaint seriously. He says “although at first glance it appears to have been written by a small child. This has been confirmed by a number of people who are helping us in the background. It is now clear that around 90 percent of what it says is a brazen lie.”

Inconsistencies had already emerged according to Dr. Fuellmich and especially those of the plaintiff himself, Dr. Justus Hoffmann, who had even verbally attacked Viviane Fischer on the witness stand in court. The public prosecutor’s office and the court seem somewhat piqued by this.

“The entire … the entire threat scenario, which was then also the background to an arrest warrant against me and the kidnapping from Mexico, is a lie. Justus Hoffmann had to admit that during his interrogation. There is not a single point: a threat with a Winchester, a threat from the party that allegedly radicalized Viviane Fischer and me, a threat to his person because, as I have only now learned, he is Ashkenazi. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that would substantiate this threat scenario. I think the public prosecutor’s office and, above all, the court have now realized that.“

In Dr. Reiner Fuellmichs Own Words.

Reiner Fuellmich: The formal reason, or the formal charge that has been brought against me, is breach of trust. The question being negotiated is: did we, did I, that was Viviane Fischer and I, who not only prepared but also carried out practically the entire committee, the entire operational work, one can argue about who was involved and to what percentage, but in any case there is no need to argue that it was the two of us and the other two, Marcel Templin, that the other three had nothing to do with the entire operational work, but were and are exclusively after the Committee’s money, are now misusing these criminal proceedings for the purpose of obtaining money that they would never obtain under normal circumstances.

So, the accusation is that the granting of a loan was a breach of trust. This accusation has already vanished into thin air.

That is the reason for the kidnapping from Mexico. I say kidnapping because they would actually have needed an international arrest warrant. But they didn’t have one. It’s clear from the file that they didn’t have one. And it’s also clear from the file that, literally, it says in there that I was supposed to be lured to Tijuana under the pretext, literally, that we had passport problems. That’s not true. Fortunately, my wife and I were there together, so, although it’s a bit of a shame because we had to endure a night in jail, my wife’s release is confirmation that these passport problems were indeed faked.

It all goes back to Justus Hoffmann, Antonia Fischer and Marcel Templin. They knew all along, as we can see from the files.

They had already tried to inform me or the public prosecutor’s office that I had an invitation to a lecture in England and actually wanted to have me arrested right then. And the next attempt was in Tijuana, where Antonia Fischer wrote: uijuijui, I hope he doesn’t fly to another consulate. So in close coordination with these three, well, how can I put it, criminals?

As far as we know, blackmail, fraud and falsification of documents, indirect falsification of documents is on their account. The Göttingen public prosecutor’s office investigated the case in close cooperation with these three criminals, for over a year, without granting me the right to be heard. This was not an oversight, but based on, no, there is no other explanation, on the freely invented threat scenario.

Until my lawyers finally realized that something was wrong and wanted to know whether there was any warrant for my arrest or any accusations against me, they were denied access to the files and also denied the right to be heard.
So, the background to this kidnapping from Mexico, so that I could then be arrested at Frankfurt airport, was solely the criminal complaint filed by these three lawyers. It was written by Justus Hoffmann, as he stated.

Rüdiger Lenz: Do you agree with the charges in the complaint? What do you say against the reasons you are accused of?

Dr Fuellmich – Let’s see what else comes of it, because we had, and this has been discussed in detail in court, we had a threat scenario for the funds, for the donations of the Corona Committee, because we had received the message, I think it was an e-mail or telephone call from Professor Sucharid Bhakdi to Viviane Fischer, which we then discussed, that we had received information that the donation account there, at MWGFD, had been seized. And if the donation account had been seized, we would not have been able to continue from one second to the next.

What the public doesn’t know yet is that I took this extremely seriously, because we communicated this at the end of 2020 in the emails that were also sent to the court, because we were also being targeted by the judiciary. And not just like that, but I, Viviane Fischer, Antonia Fischer, our accountant, Justus Hoffmann, were under investigation for suspected money laundering. That was the trigger. As a result, we were targeted by the main customs office, the Lower Saxony State Office of Criminal Investigation and finally the Göttingen public prosecutor’s office. I was aware of this suspicion of money laundering.

I also expressed this in emails to everyone, including Antonia Fischer and Justus Hoffmann, who, however, never got involved and never responded to an email. I said, guys, this is also dangerous for us, because the termination of our donation accounts, the company didn’t have one, so first I held one in trust for the committee, then Tobias Weisenborn, my colleague, and then I held two accounts again. They were all canceled, starting in July 2020. From the end of July 2020, we knew, at least those who know a bit about law, Tobias Weisenborn and I, we knew, and I also said so in the emails: “Attention, we are also being targeted, the accounts have been terminated.

This is solely due to the fact that the banks suspect money laundering. They reported this to the main customs office and then to the state criminal investigation office.”

As I have now seen from the files, they were actually investigating us. And at the time, everything was known, including the loans, including the fact that all communication, I would say 95 percent of communication with the committee donors and auditors, went through our law firm. This was all known and the public prosecutor, who was then involved, took note of it all, classified everything correctly and said, yes, it may be that some money was taken, loans were meant, but that doesn’t mean that it won’t come back. And that was exactly the plan.

So Viviane and I each withdrew money to secure it. We had real estate as a store of value, so I certainly did. And it was never meant to be a liquidity reserve, that’s stupid. Because if it had been a liquidity reserve, we would have had to store it in other accounts and it would have been exposed to seizure again. So both she and I let the money disappear, always in the knowledge that it would be repaid anyway. At least I did from my store of value, we both spent it, that’s quite clear. It was a personal loan. This personal loan was reported openly, not secretly. And it was also listed correctly in the books.

So the accusation is embezzlement because of this loan. However, a loan is not a gift or withdrawal of money, but always involves an obligation to repay. This repayment obligation affected both of us. The court agrees that we were both willing and able to repay the money. I would have done it long ago … I’ve known since the end of 2020 that Germany’s economy was being driven to the wall. That didn’t escape some people’s notice and now you can see how true it is. We were determined to sell our house. The house was sold for 1.345 million. At the time, the land register was clean, it only contained owner’s debts. These are land charges that are empty.

And 6 weeks later, Mr. Templin had this land charge registered for himself by way of fraud, blackmail and indirect false certification. If he hadn’t done that, and if he hadn’t deceived the notary and the buyer and put them under pressure, saying that I would foreclose on the property that you had just bought and that you wanted to move into if you didn’t transfer the money to me, then the 700,000 would have gone back to the committee. However, I would have liked to know beforehand who the committee is. It’s certainly not these two or the three Berliners. If anything, there is only one committee company that was not only founded but also registered. And that was Viviane Fischer’s and mine. There are still a number of corporate law details to be clarified. But to round off the accusation or to make its rejection clear.

Infidelity is an offense that dates back to the Third Reich and is extremely controversial. The specific accusation against me is that I have breached a duty to look after assets and thereby caused damage to those whose assets I am responsible for looking after. The judiciary says that this is all unconstitutional, but the Constitutional Court says that it is unconstitutional because nobody knows what a duty to look after assets actually is, what is the breach of duty here and what is the damage? It is so unclear that none of the addressees, i.e. those to whom the law is directed, know what is punishable and what is not. It is particularly bad for directors of public limited companies, for managing directors of companies, limited liability companies, such as ours, a small limited liability company, which was supposed to be a UG, but never became one because Justus Hoffmann prevented the company from being registered with the help of a very dubious tax advisor, so it never became a UG. But at least it was supposed to become one.

And it is particularly difficult for company directors to do anything at all when this unclear threat of embezzlement from Section 266 of the German Criminal Code (StGB) is constantly looming over everything. That is precisely the problem here. My actions as managing director, including those of Viviane Fischer as managing director – we were the only ones who did anything in the business – must be examined here. Is there a duty to look after the assets? If so, to whom and for what reason? There can only have been one towards the donors and the spectators, because the articles of association state that none of us get the money, even if we leave. But that’s exactly what the two former substitute members of the committee Viviane, sorry, Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer are now trying to do.

They are trying to get money that they are not entitled to, contrary to the statutes. They already have money in their account. This is the purchase price from my property, which should actually have gone to me, or to my wife’s account, and it includes my money, my clients’ money and also the committee’s money. Mind you, who the committee is still needs to be clarified.

So, the obligation to look after the assets, if it existed at all, was towards the donors. However, the Göttingen public prosecutor’s office has already established that there is nothing there as part of the fraud investigation that took place earlier. We delivered exactly what we wanted, namely clarification. There is tons of material on this, you can still look it up today. You can also see that the other two substitutes never played a role for us. So the obligation to look after assets, if at all, was to the donors and the spectators. The question was, that is the crucial question, was there a breach of duty? I have only now seen from the files that this loan was a breach of duty in a situation, in a dangerous situation, as we perceived it and as it actually was. That they were really after the five of us.

The Berliners probably still don’t know that, and even if they get the file, that doesn’t mean they’re capable of reading it. But the danger was real. Can you do that in a situation like that? And there is the famous business judgment rule. This is a rule according to which managing directors of companies have a wide margin of discretion in their actions, because they can’t constantly be afraid that everything I do here will blow up in my face and land me in jail. And this margin of discretion is extended again in dangerous situations, as we perceived them. Since both of us, me and Viviane, at least that’s what the court clearly conceded to me, were always able and willing to repay, if 700,000 out of 1.345 million is not quite so big, not a big problem, there can’t have been a breach of duty here.

Apart from that, this was covered by the presumed consent of the donors and viewers. Because in the situation in which we found ourselves, it was certainly not in the interests of the donors and viewers to do nothing and wait until we too were seized, so that the very people whose actions we were supposed to investigate would then snatch the donation money on the basis of the order placed on us and supported by the donors and viewers. In other words, the state, which has failed here in a far more brutal way.

On the contrary. There is also embezzlement by omission. If we hadn’t done anything, we’d have been prosecuted for omission. There is also case law on this. So, that’s the accusation that must disappear into thin air, as we have now filed a criminal complaint against the three Berliners for fraud, extortion, breach of trust and by omission, apology, breach of trust and indirect false certification. Will the public prosecutor’s office investigate as diligently as they did against me?

Rüdiger Lenz: Is it true that Dr. Justus P. Hoffmann made negative comments about Viviane Fischer in court on the third day of the trial? If so, in what way did he do that?

Reiner Fuellmich: Yes, at the end of the session I tried to take a first step by asking why he behaved like that. Why is he trying to grab money that he is not entitled to from any conceivable point of view, contrary to the statutes that he is aware of? I wanted to bring about a clarification. This is not yet finished, it will be. But it is absolutely right that this back and forth by Justus Hoffmann only makes sense with this explanation, which is still to come. Yes, he did indeed make very negative comments about her, waffling back and forth. She was a ticking time bomb, that’s probably what he said. She had no idea about law, he was the great guru (Reiner Fuellmich laughs). It’s downright ridiculous, he didn’t even exist as a lawyer before 2019, at least not as a lawyer. Without Professor Dr. Martin Schwab, these three lawyers would not exist as port lawyers and none of them would ever have managed to get a brief together, at least in my estimation.

So, that’s right, he made very negative comments. I don’t know what that was about, but he keeps trying to find his way back to Viviane, trying to make nice with her. “Yes, no, I asked you to pay.” Him 100,000 (Reiner Fuellmich laughs), you wonder who else he wants to extort money from? But I think we’d better leave that alone, I’ve put that on the back burner in the meantime.

Just like he can’t back up almost everything he’s actually claimed with anything. It’s true, he came down hard on her too. Let’s see what he does next.

Rüdiger Lenz: What is the connection between the port lawyers in Berlin and the Corona Committee? And which people are legally authorized to represent them? Can you say something about what form of company you and Viviane Fischer and possibly others have taken in terms of the Corona Committee?

Reiner Fuellmich: Well, the three port lawyers, only two of them are associated with the Corona Committee. Marcel Templin has never had anything to do with it. He always wanted to be part of it, especially during one of the phases when Justus Hoffmann was, well, how shall we put it, completely unavailable due to health issues, he tried to force himself onto the committee instead of Justus Hoffmann, but neither Viviane nor I wanted to see him there. We believe that he had neither the professional nor the personal qualifications to do so. The other two were originally formally members of the company behind the Corona Committee. But this company never came into being. It was founded, but it was never registered. And precisely because Antonia Fischer and Justus Hoffmann prevented it from being registered. In my opinion, they deliberately prevented it so that they could create this chaos in order to get the committee’s money.

The company, that was this … Corona-, Vorsteuer, Corona-Auschuss (Vorschald) … (Reiner Fuellmich speaks indistinctly here) UG in Gründung or something like that was probably its name. It is still in formation today. Because contrary to the claims that Justus Hoffmann made in between, it was never founded. But these are many of his claims that cannot be reconciled with reality in any way, including that I once said in a public chat that I had appropriated 85 percent of the committee funds. That’s absolutely stupid stuff from someone who has obviously lost control of his life.

Rüdiger Lenz: In a personal statement on the third day of the trial, which was published on Bittel.TV, you said that you are charged with an offense under Section 266 of the German Criminal Code, which is a Nazi law and was introduced by the Nazis in 1933. Incidentally, the denazification of Germany was a condition imposed on Germany after 1945 by the victorious Allied powers. In this sense, they are accused of disloyalty. You reject disloyalty. Why?

– Dr. Reiner Fuellmich has already answered this question sufficiently above. –

Rüdiger Lenz: In the same personal statement, you say that you suspect that the complainants want the donors’ money for the Corona Committee, your money, Viviane Fischer’s money and that of your clients. Can you explain what you mean by that?

Reiner Fuellmich: Yes, they still have money from my clients from the class action. That must be around half a million, 500,000. I don’t know what they’ve done with it. Those are my clients. They should have handed over the documents to me. They want Viviane’s money. There’s a letter dated December 4, I think, from Justus Hoffmann to …, just a second (a prison officer reminds Fuellmich to get to the end), there’s a letter from Justus Hoffmann to Viviane Fischer, they want 700,000 from her. Yes, and they announce that they want another 500,000 or more from her. That’s already 1.2 – 1.3 million that they want from her.

In the meantime, he (note from Rüdiger Lenz: this refers to Justus Hoffmann at the court hearing in early February 2024) has done a backwards roll in court. They still have 1.158 million from me in their account, to which they have no claim under any conceivable circumstances, zero. I think that has slowly become clear in court.

And they also want to get their hands on the gold. That’s another million or more. So, depending on how you add it up and what you can imagine Justus Hoffmann coming up with (Reiner Fuellmich laughs), how much he will then claim, it comes to around 5 million. Wait a minute, I think I have to …

Rüdiger Lenz: The conversation was ended here by the prison officers.

Dr. Fuellmich, thank you for answering this first part of my questions to you and I wish you and your wife strength and God’s blessing on the path of justice.
+++
Orignally published – https://apolut.net/app/

More From Dr Reiner Fuellmich in an Audio Recording

Please click on the picture link to hear an address from Reiner Fuellmich published on the February 23rd. ,https://www.bitchute.com/video/Li8rom8lczli

Message From Inka Fuellmich.

Lawyer and friend of The Fuellmich’s Elsa Schneider published a message from Reiner’s wife, Inka Fuellmich, “But” Elsa wrote, “someone questioned one thing she wrote – that Justus Hoffman asked the public prosecutor to finally stop the interview because, after all, he was promised protection. Inka immediately went to her source to verify and it turned out that the text should read”

“At the end of the witness interview of Justus Hoffman, it is the subjective impression of Inka’s source that JH looked at the prosecutor for help. (Note that the public prosecutor is the accuser on behalf of the state. JH is the complainant and was being questioned as a witness.) The witness, JH, asked the public prosecutor to finally stop the interview. According to further information, this is because questions were being repeated.”

Here is her revised message, with the references to JH deleted:

Message From Inka

“We are all following every court day with our hearts and we are perhaps even waiting for a major event, that could end everything, that would finally open people’s eyes and bring them to seeing what is happening. We have great expectations for the future. The longer we are hoping, the stronger our hope becomes.

Sometimes it is difficult for me to recognize whether or not what I am seeing is a coherent picture: who influenced whom and pushed them to the appropriate position to exert influence.

However, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: that Reiner’s arrest had nothing to do with money, that it has a purely political background.

I’m sure, next week the picture will be a bit more complete. The presiding judge has ordered further court dates. At least it seems as though he wants to get to the bottom of the matter. But will he be strong enough? Or is it just a delusion again?

Without all of your support, it would not be possible for Reiner to finance good legal support. We have also brought in an experienced defense lawyer. It is important to follow everything closely, every aspect of every situation. That is too much for one lawyer.

Our observers in the court are helping, as are Reiner’s supporters, who continue to keep him psychologically stable, heal and bless him.

But also the people are helping who send him donations and thus actively help shape the process by allowing us to build up pressure against a system that wants to mislead us.

A big thank you also to all the lovely people who included me in their good wishes for Reiner. Even though I don’t write back, I read it all and then I know that my path is the right one and that we will all stand still together even after this time.

Sometimes I feel drained. A lot of energy has gone into the last few years. Yet I have never lost my firm conviction, which I think we all share.

I send a big, heartfelt thanks to all of you and to Elsa, who always helps me when I feel weak.

We will wait!!!

Summary of Day 5 of Reiner Fuellmich’s trial from one of his lawyers Katja Woermer With Subtitles.

Trial Reports

Jiota for ICIC Law News has shared an account of all of the trial days which I have put into seperate files below.

The Process A Report by Jiota for ICIC Law News.

Trial Days 1 and 2

Trial Day 3

Trial Days 4 and 5

The trial of Reiner Fuelmich continues……………….

The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..

Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.

Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…

Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support

Read the full article at the original website

References:

Search Results

Bookmarks