How the Endless Boosters Will Destroy Immune Function
You can quote several words to match them as a full term:
"some text to search"
otherwise, the single words will be understood as distinct search terms.
ANY of the entered words would match
9 min read

How the Endless Boosters Will Destroy Immune Function

A number of medical experts, scientists and published studies now warn that the COVID shots reprogram your immune system to respond in a dysfunctional manner.
How the Endless Boosters Will Destroy Immune Function

Aside from increasing vulnerability to infections, this can also result in autoimmune diseases and cancer.

Pfizer Shot Reprograms Both Arms of Your Immune System

A paper posted May 6, 2021, on the preprint server medRxiv reported that the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID jab "reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses," causing immune depletion. While they confirmed the jab "induced effective humoral and cellular immunity against several SARS-CoV-2 variants," the shot "also modulated the production of infiammatory cytokines by innate immune cells upon stimulation with both specific (SARS-CoV-2) and nonspecific (viral, fungal and bacterial) stimuli." In other words, we're looking at a horrible tradeoff. You may get some protection against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, but you're weakening your overall immune function, which opens the door wide to all sorts of other health problems, from bacterial, fungal and viral infections to cancer and autoimmunity. After the injection, innate immune cells had a markedly decreased response to toll-like receptors 4, 7 and 8 (TLR4, TLR7, TLR8) ligands, while cytokine responses induced by fungi were stronger. According to the authors, defects in TLR7 have previously been linked to an increased susceptibility to COVID-19 in young males. People who were "fully vaccinated," having received two doses of the Pfizer shot, also produced significantly less interferon upon stimulation, and this can hamper the initial innate immune response against the virus.

Repeated Vaccinations and the Risk of Autoimmunity

Pathogenic infections and cancer are but two potential outcomes of this kind of reprogramming. Previous research, for example, has linked defects in the immune system to a higher risk of autoimmune diseases. What's more, it's been shown that antigens in vaccines, specifically, can induce this kind of immune system dysfunction. As reported in the paper in question:

"Repeated immunization with antigen causes systemic autoimmunity in miceotherwise not prone to spontaneous autoimmune diseases. Overstimulation ofCD4+ T cells led to the development of autoantibody-inducing CD4+ T (aiCD4+
123
T) cell which had undergone T cell receptor (TCR) revision and was capable ofinducing autoantibodies.The aiCD4+ T cell was induced by de novo TCR revision but not by cross-reaction, and subsequently overstimulated CD8+ T cells, driving them tobecome antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL).These CTLs could be further matured by antigen cross-presentation, afterwhich they caused autoimmune tissue injury akin to systemic lupuserythematosus (SLE). Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitableconsequence of over-stimulating the host's immune 'system' by repeatedimmunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organizedcriticality."

Fast-forward to mid-May 2021, when a study in the Journal of Clinical Investigations reported that "SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce broad CD4+ T cell responses that recognize SARS-CoV-2 variants and HCoV-NL63." HCoV-NL63 is a human coronavirus associated with the common cold.

"Interestingly, we observed a 3-fold increase in the CD4+ T cell responses toHCoV-NL63 spike peptides after vaccination,"

the authors stated, adding

, "Ourresults suggest that T cell responses elicited or enhanced by SARS-CoV-2mRNA vaccines may be able to control SARS-CoV-2 variants and lead to cross-protection against some endemic coronaviruses."

What they did not address was that excessive CD4a+ T cell responses could also result in the development of autoantibodies and autoimmune disease.

COVID Shots May Also Cause More Hazardous Variants

We've long known that leaky or nonsterilizing vaccines can trigger the evolution of more hazardous viruses. So far, SARS-CoV-2 variants have mutated into less dangerous versions, which is fortunate, but the risk of the COVID shots creating a "monster" still remains.

45678

In a February 9, 2021, article, NPR highlighted this risk, stating that "vaccines could drive the evolution of more COVID-19 mutants." According to NPR science correspondent Richard Harris, "the virus is always mutating. And if one happens to produce a mutation that makes it less vulnerable to the vaccine, that virus could simply multiply in a vaccinated individual." The Omicron variant appears to have significant resistance against antibodies produced by the original COVID shots, which is why Omicron infection is being primarily reported in those who have received the injections. In 2018, Quanta Magazine detailed how vaccines drive the evolution of pathogens. I've referenced that article on previous occasions, as have many others. In response, the editor of Quanta Magazine added a "disclaimer" dated December 6, 2021, to the article, stating:

"This article from 2018 discusses how leaky vaccines — vaccines that do notreduce viral replication or transmission to others — can drive the pathogensthey target to evolve and become more virulent. These concerns do not apply toCOVID-19 vaccines, because COVID-19 vaccines significantly reducecoronavirus replication and transmission, reducing the chance that mutationsoccur and variants arise ..."

That statement is clearly false, as studies have repeatedly shown the COVID shots are in fact leaky. They do not "significantly reduce" viral replication or transmission, as the editor claims. Quite the opposite. People who have received one or more COVID shots have been found to harbor higher viral loads than the unvaccinated, and Israel (which appears to have the best tracking and monitoring) reports that the worst COVID cases are in those who are fully vaxxed. December 6, 2021, Newsweek reported a COVID outbreak among "fully vaccinated" hospital staff in Spain. After a Christmas dinner with more than 170 fully vaxxed health care workers in attendance, nearly 70 of them tested positive for COVID. Some reported

91011

mild symptoms. Daniel Horowitz pointed out the editor's false note in a December 9, 2021, Blaze post:

"Leaky vaccines are worse than no vaccine at all. That is the unmistakableconclusion one would derive from a May 2018 article in Quanta magazine, a topscientific publication, about the unsuccessful attempts to create vaccines forHIV, malaria, and anthrax that aren't leaky and don't run the risk of making thepathogens more dangerous.Yet now that we are seeing such a microbiological Frankenstein play out in reallife and people like Dr. Robert Malone have been citing this article to raise redfiags about the leaky COVID shots, Quanta magazine took the unprecedentedstep of slapping an editor's note on an article three and a half years later to getpeople to stop applying it to the leakiest vaccine of all time."

COVID Shots Stop Working Within a Few Months

A study in the New England Journal of Medicine, published December 9, 2021, also confirms that whatever protection you get from the Pfizer COVID shot is short in duration. As explained by the authors:

"In December 2020, Israel began a mass vaccination campaign againstcoronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) by administering the BNT162b2 vaccine,which led to a sharp curtailing of the outbreak.After a period with almost no cases of severe acute respiratory syndromecoronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, a resurgent Covid-19 outbreak began inmid-June 2021. Possible reasons for the resurgence were reduced vaccineeffectiveness against the delta (B.1.617.2) variant and waning immunity.We used data on confirmed infection and severe disease collected from anIsraeli national database for the period of July 11 to 31, 2021, for all Israeliresidents who had been fully vaccinated before June 2021.
1213
We used a Poisson regression model to compare rates of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe Covid-19 among persons vaccinated during differenttime periods, with stratification according to age group and with adjustment forpossible confounding factors.Among persons 60 years of age or older, the rate of infection in the July 11-31period was higher among persons who became fully vaccinated in January2021 (when they were first eligible) than among those fully vaccinated 2months later, in March (rate ratio, 1.6 ...)Among persons 40 to 59 years of age, the rate ratio for infection among thosefully vaccinated in February (when they were first eligible), as compared with 2months later, in April, was 1.7 ... Among persons 16 to 39 years of age, the rateratio for infection among those fully vaccinated in March (when they were firsteligible), as compared with 2 months later, in May, was 1.6 ...The rate ratio for severe disease among persons fully vaccinated in the monthwhen they were first eligible, as compared with those fully vaccinated in March,was 1.8 ... among persons 60 years of age or older and 2.2 ... among those 40to 59 years of age ...These findings indicate that immunity against the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2waned in all age groups a few months after receipt of the second dose ofvaccine."

Two Doses Aren't Enough

Earlier this year, vaccine makers and health authorities said the shots were about 95% effective and if enough people got the shots, normalcy would be restored. We now know that was a false promise. The goal post was moved back with the emergence of Delta and then Omicron, for which we're now told we need a third booster. December 13, 2021, Reuters reported that British scientists have concluded "two-dose COVID-19 vaccine regimens do not induce enough neutralizing antibodies against the

14

Omicron coronavirus variant," and that "increased infections in those previously infected or vaccinated may be likely."

'Just Deal With' Booster Shots, Fauci Says

When in mid-December 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci was asked if Americans should expect annual COVID boosters, he replied in the afirmative, saying that Americans will "just have to deal with" the prospect of getting boosters at regular intervals. So, in essence, Fauci wants us to accept that booster deficiency is the reason why the COVID-19 "pandemic" continues. Clearly, that is not the case. The real reason COVID is still an issue is because Fauci and the medical establishment have suppressed viable early treatments. If early treatment was the norm, COVID would rapidly become a distant memory.

As predicted over a year ago, we're now on aninjection treadmill with no end in sight, and everysingle dose carries the risk of serious side effects, upto and including permanent disability and death. Theonly scientifically sound way out of this failedexperiment is to stop. No more boosters.

Instead, the captured U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization to novel gene transfer technologies that don't work like conventional vaccines in that they don't prevent infection and spread, thus creating an evil cycle of new vaccine-resistant variants. As demonstrated by James Lyons-Weiler (in a now broken weblink), the more we vaccinate, the higher the COVID caseload.

15

Weiler's graph looks very much like that in a September 30, 2021, study in the European Journal of Epidemiology, which found that the higher the vaccination rate in a given area, the higher the COVID case rate. Dr. Chris Martenson discusses this finding in the video below. As noted by Martenson, "the line goes the wrong way," meaning the more heavily "vaccinated" a population is, the worse things get. As predicted over a year ago, we're now on an injection treadmill with no end in sight, and every single dose carries the risk of serious side effects, up to and including permanent disability and death. The only scientifically sound way out of this failed experiment is to stop. No more boosters. Fortunately, it seems most Americans are starting to catch on, and so far, the fearmongering around Omicron has not resulted in a rush for boosters. According to an Axios/Ipsos poll conducted December 10 through December 13, 2021, 67% of unvaccinated respondents said Omicron makes no difference in their decision of

1617
  • The AAPS protocol
  • World Council for Health protocol
  • America's Frontline Doctors
  • Dr. Peter McCullough's Ambulatory Treatment of COVID-19

whether to get vaccinated; 19% said it makes them more likely while 11% said it makes them less likely to get the shot. Among respondents who already had received one or two doses, 59% said Omicron makes no difference in their decision to get a third dose; 36% said it makes them more likely and 5% said it makes them less likely to get it. Considering the shots have been shown to deregulate your immune function, it would be wise to "just say no" to further boosters. Should you develop symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, remember there are safe and effective early treatment protocols, including the I-MASK+ and I-MATH+, protocols, which are available for download on the COVID Critical Care website in multiple languages. Other protocols that have great success are: The AAPS protocol Tess Laurie's World Council for Health protocol America's Frontline Doctors Dr. Peter McCullough's Ambulatory Treatment of COVID-19 This is a load of information to review, especially if you are fatigued and sick with COVID or have a family member struggling. After reviewing all of these protocols, I believe the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance's protocol is among the easiest to follow. Below is a summary of that protocol, with minor amendments.

1819

Read the full article at the original website

References: