Italy: Allow Everyone Rescued to Disembark
You can quote several words to match them as a full term:
"some text to search"
otherwise, the single words will be understood as distinct search terms.
ANY of the entered words would match
5 min read

Italy: Allow Everyone Rescued to Disembark

Italy: Allow Everyone Rescued to Disembark

(London) – The Italian government’s refusal to allow about 250 people to disembark from two nongovernmental rescue ships docked in Catania and its directive to the rescue ships to take them back to international waters puts people at risk and violates Italy’s human rights obligations, Human Rights Watch said today. Over the weekend of November 5 and 6, 2022, the Italian government allowed the two rescue vessels – Humanity 1, operated by SOS Humanity, and the Geo Barents, operated by Médécins Sans Frontières (MSF) – to dock at Catania port temporarily. Following government-ordered summary “vulnerability” assessments by two doctors selected by the authorities, 144 people from the Humanity 1 and 357 people from the Geo Barents were allowed to disembark, mainly women, children, and men with physical health problems. One of the men forced to remain on the Humanity 1 subsequently collapsed and was evacuated by ambulance, leaving 34 on board.

The authorities are refusing to allow 215 people to disembark from the Geo Barents. One of them had to be medically evacuated overnight, leaving 214 on board. “The government’s actions cruelly expose survivors of abuse in Libya to potential further harm, and deny them their right to seek asylum in defiance of Italian and international law,” said Giulia Tranchina, Europe and Central Asia researcher at Human Rights Watch. “No one should be deliberately exposed to degrading conditions, and everyone should be allowed to disembark and have their claims for international protection fairly processed.” The “vulnerability” assessments were carried out by physicians without the assistance of interpreters or psychologists and appear to have been based primarily or solely on evaluations of physical health. Under these conditions, exhausted survivors would have had limited capacity to provide any details about their full medical condition, mental health problems, or experiences of abuse. Journalists were denied access to the dock, prompting criticism by the European Federation of Journalists. Italian authorities have ordered both rescue ships to leave the port with people on board, arguing that the flag states – Germany and Norway – are responsible for those who remain.

The captains of both ships have refused to follow the directive, and SOS Humanity says it is taking the Italian government to court to challenge the lawfulness of this policy and allow the survivors to exercise their rights to disembark and seek asylum. International human rights and refugee law, as well as European Union directives and the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, guarantee the right to seek asylum and prohibit collective expulsions. Under maritime law, a rescue is considered concluded when all rescued people have disembarked promptly in a place of safety. Ships may be considered places of safety only temporarily. While there is a doctrine of exclusive flag state jurisdiction on the high seas, ships – and the people on them – in port are subject to the jurisdiction of the port state. Two other rescue ships operated by nongovernmental organizations had been waiting in the Mediterranean for the authorities to assign them a port.

The Ocean Viking, operated by SOS Mediterranee, has 234 people on board, while Rise Above, operated by Mission Lifeline, has 89.

They have been experiencing bad weather conditions and high waves. Six people had to be medically evacuated from Rise Above. On the evening of November 7, Italian authorities finally told the Rise Above it could dock at the port of Reggio Calabria, while the Ocean Viking was still stranded at sea. Since October 20, nongovernmental rescue ships rescued about 1,000 people, while in the same period over 11,000 people arrived in Italy by sea autonomously or following rescues by the Italian Coast Guard.

The only people arriving facing problems with disembarking are those rescued by the nongovernmental ships. Nongovernmental rescue ships were responsible for bringing only 14 percent of the people who disembarked in Italy in the last 12 months, and contrary to all the efforts by Italian authorities to stigmatize their life-saving operations, there is no evidence that nongovernmental groups constitute a pull factor. Migrants and asylum seekers should not be trapped in limbo at sea for political gains or as leverage in negotiations, Human Rights Watch said. Italy and Malta are the closest coastal states to Libya with the responsibility to ensure that all rescued people can disembark promptly. Libya is not a safe place for migrants and asylum seekers, so survivors rescued at sea cannot be lawfully required to disembark there. A fact-finding inquiry by the United Nations concluded in June that there were “reasonable grounds to believe that crimes against humanity are being committed against migrants in Libya,” including “murder, enforced disappearance, torture, enslavement, sexual violence, rape, and other inhumane acts ... in connection with their arbitrary detention.” At the same time, it is important for the European Union to move toward an effective system for sharing responsibilities as part of a common European asylum system.

The decision by a group of European countries, including Germany and Norway, to set up a voluntary platform in June to relocate asylum seekers from EU coastal states is a positive if slow-moving step. More is needed including at the EU level, Human Rights Watch said. “Trapping people on ships or stranding them at sea is not serious immigration policy: it’s just inhumane and unlawful theater,” Tranchina said. “Rather than violating people’s rights and alienating European partners, Italy should be advocating a predictable system for people to disembark and the resumption of state-led European search and rescue operations, alongside an equitable system for sharing responsibility for migrants and asylum seekers.”.

Read the full article at the original website

References: