From ... in Alternative News — Apr 14, 2018

MIT Professor Emeritus Claims Chemical Attacks In Syria Are Not Assad’s Doing

Terror and war have been heavily part of our planet for the last century, and despite the fact that these types of activities don’t seem to be feel natural for the average, empathetic human being, they are still carried out as the world looks on in disbelief and heart break. Who truly wants war? At the end of the day, these are human beings are carrying out the will of another, who will never fight themselves, and this appears to be a form of brainwashing.

The purpose of this article is to explore what really is going on and why this is important for us to realize before we can expect change to happen. We are suggesting that these attacks are conducted by a group of people, working for another group of powerful people, but are blamed on another. In this case, President Bashar Al-Assad and the Syrian government are the ones getting blamed for an attack they likely did not commit. Some even go as far as saying these are staged, in all sense of that term, with regards to this latest attack, a Russian foreign Minister said: “We have irrefutable evidence that this was yet another performance and that security services of a country which is trying to be in the frontlines of the Russophobic campaign were involved in this performance.” A lot of things are being said, and it’s up to you to do your research if you’re truly interested in finding out what is really going on. With that understanding, note that this is still considered a false flag. An event that did in fact happen but one that isn’t as it seems so as to push forward an agenda. False flag events comprise both of real and staged events. Within the past 10 years alone, it’s amazing how much information has emerged from credible sources about how what we are being told by mainstream media outlets with regards to major events, especially international geopolitics, is simply false. It’s not hard to believe, take the governments relationship with media, for example. A CIA document states that the CIA task force “now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,” and that “this has helped us turn some ‘intelligence failure’ stories into ‘intelligence success’ stories, and has contributed to the accuracy of countless others.” Furthermore, it explains how the agency has “persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources and methods.” We’ve also seen multiple award winning journalists come out and blow the whistle on government and corporate influence in the media. Related CE Articles: 3 Popular Mainstream Media Journalists Come Together To Tell The Truth About Tell Lie Vision Declassified CIA Documents Shows Agencies Control Over Mainstream Media Academia 9/11 could perhaps be one of the best and most well known examples. Many people, including academics, and politicians have voiced their concern that the Deep State (within the US government) carried out these attacks in order to justify the invasion of the Middle East. This is why at least half of the American population didn’t believe the official government explanation of the events which transpired that day, not because they are ‘conspiracy theorists,’ but because of all of the evidence. More than a decade later we have multiple peer-reviewed studies emerge from scientists and engineers emphasizing to the world that there is no possible way that planes could have taken down WTC 1 and 2, don’t forget about 7. Nothing at all hit that building. “The global war on terrorism is a US undertaking, which is fake, it’s based on fake premises. It tells us that somehow America and the Western world are going after a fictitious enemy, the Islamic state, when in fact the Islamic state is fully supported and financed by the Western military alliance and America’s allies in the Persian Gulf.” – Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, University of Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics, spoken at the International Conference on the New World Order, organized and sponsored by the Perdana Global Peace Foundation. This is why talking about what happened in Syria is important because we know these events are used to infiltrate and supposedly bring democracy to these countries under distress. But again, are we putting them in distress so we can go in and invade, making it look completely justifiable, and even humanitarian in the eyes of the masses? Is this what our ‘leaders’ are really doing? Syrian President, Bashar Al Assad, will be the first to tell you: But many others within the realm of global politics and academia will do the same, like Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Theodore Postol, who wrote a preliminary review of the US government with regards to the attack that took place last year. It’s a six-page report, that, according to him, “unambiguously shows that the assumption in the White House report that there was no tampering with the alleged site of the sarin release is not correct.” Postol mentions that this assumption was “totally unjustified...and no competent intelligence analyst would have agreed that this assumption was valid.” He is stating that the official report on the attack released by the US Government was not done so by intelligent, good hearted and competent intelligence experts, “unless they were motivated by factors other than concerns about the accuracy of the report.” These are quite emotionally charged allegations, and it’s obviously something many people, even within the United States, are feeling strongly about, despite the complete opposite rhetoric from mainstream media. And we are getting the same kind of buzz with this years story too. His key proof came from a series of photographs of the crater where the container holding the sarin gas was supposedly air-dropped. In the photograph, several men inspecting the site are wearing medical gloves and loose clothing. Again, this has nothing to do with the attack that just took place. But the same thing is happening, Assad and others are denying their involvement, and there is currently an international investigation into what really took place. He is one of many who raised doubts about the quality of Washington’s intelligence assessment about last years attacks, so it’s going to be interesting to see what happens this year.

There will probably be multiple reports.

The Deep State is pushing the idea that this is Assad’s doing, yet multiple people from within the government and academia, all over the world, are saying no.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) just arrived today at the site to do an inspection. Related CE Article: Declassified CIA Report Exposes Over 25 Years of U.S. Plans To Destabilize Syria. He stated, “If there were any sarin present at this location when this photograph was taken everybody in the photograph would have received a lethal or debilitating does of sarin...

The fact that these people were dressed so inadequately either suggests a complete ignorance of the basic measures needed to protect an individual from sarin poisoning, or that they knew that the site was not seriously contaminated.” It’s great to see prominent academic figures like this stand for truth, instead of keeping quiet for a pay-check.

The funny thing is, it was the CIA Director, Mike Pompeo, confirming that it was the CIA that concluded that the Syrian government was behind these attacks. Or should we simply just say the Deep State, which seems to now have completely taken a hold of Donald Trump‘s administration, as with most presidents before him. On a personal level I’d like to say that the amount of evidence showing what is really happening with regards to the attacks in Syria is overwhelming. Various good-hearted politicians and academics are laying it out for people bluntly, these are fabricated events created by the western military alliance, the Deep State, in order to justify the infiltration and bombing that is currently taking place in Syria. Is this a take-over agenda, disguised as a rescue mission? Another key point is the timeline to which both of the recent Syrian chemical attacks took place. On March 30, 2017, Reuters reported that Syria was no longer a US priority. 5 days after a gas attack takes place in Syria and the US responds with 59 Tomahawk missiles. Onto to March 29, 2018 and Trump states the US would “be coming out of Syria like very soon,” just hours after the Pentagon highlighted the need for US troops to remain in the country for the immediate future. “We’re knocking the hell out of ISIS. We’ll be coming out of Syria like very soon. Let the other people take care of it now,” Trump told supporters at an Ohio event on infrastructure, as CNN reported. Just days later on April 7, 2018, the White Helmets report that Assad had gassed his own people yet again.

Then on April 8, 2018, the US blames Russia, Iran, and Syria for the events. What’s also interesting to mention is that other world leaders saw this coming after the last supposed chemical weapons attack in Syria that took place last year. Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly stated that this attack was a “false flag” and that “more are being prepared in Syria.” In a joint press conference with Italian President Sergio Mattarella in Moscow, Putin said, “We have reports from multiple sources that false flags like this one – and I cannot call it otherwise – are being prepared in other parts of Syria, including the southern suburbs of Damascus.

They plan to plant some chemical there and accuse the Syrian government of an attack.” Not long ago, at his talk at the 13th annual meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club, he expressed how the global community is getting tired of the powers that be and how they continue to “churn out threats, imaginary and mythical threats such as the ‘Russian military threat,’” explaining how it’s a “profitable business that can be used to pump new money into defence budgets at home, get allies to bend to a single superpower’s interests, expand NATO and bring its infrastructure, military units and arms closer to our borders.” He then goes on to describe the anti-Russian propaganda the U.S. has spread in recent years: “Another mythical and imaginary problem is what I can only call the hysteria the USA has whipped up over supposed Russian meddling in the American presidential election.

The United States has plenty of genuinely urgent problems, it would seem, from the colossal public debt to the increase in firearms violence and cases of arbitrary action by the police.” You can read that entire transcript and watch the video of his comments here. No, this isn’t Russian propaganda or fake news, it’s simply information that’s verifiable, it’s up to us as readers and people to look at more than one perspective on something.

The false flag narrative, before a few years ago, was never even brought up by these world ‘leaders.’ Now it seems to be a common term, and so does the Deep State. Truth isn’t truth because a politician says it to be. We can all do our own critical thinking and independent research instead of giving away our perception to the television. If we did this, we would see a different story, and it would be much easier to decipher honest versus dishonest comments that emerge from the mouths of most politicians, but not all. Here are some related CE Articles regarding the last chemical attack that took place in Syria: Assad’s Top Political Advisor Says US Missile Strike Killed The People Fighting Terrorists Assad Says Syria Chemical Attack Was Fabricated The US Is Hand In Glove With Terrorists Popular American Journalist, Ben Swann, Explains How There Was No Sarin Gas Attack By Assad In Syria The Pentagon Is Spending $2.2 Billion To Arm Syrian Rebels Falsify Paperwork This is because it’s one of many examples of how our perception, our own human consciousness, is being manipulated and used to serve the will of a rogue group of financial elite. Unnecessary human suffering is taking place and we are allowing it by staying unaware and calling for war based on their manipulative tactics. We are thrust into a state of fear in thinking there are so many enemies out to get us all the time and this fear makes us easy to manipulate. When we begin to see the truth, we begin to take back power and suddenly their tactics don’t have the same power as we are seeing today. It’s also important to reflect that our patriotism towards our country can often be misguided, as we are joining armies and protecting people based on ideas that are not factual. This type of manipulation of consciousness occurs at all levels, and not just with geopolitical topics. No longer than five years ago, suggesting that events like these are false flag acts received such harsh criticism, today, it seems more and more people have actually done some independent research and can now see things that are becoming, in the eyes of many, extremely obvious. Thus we are expanding how we see things. Events like 9/11, and events that’ve been playing out in Syria and all across the Middle East, although seen as dark by some, have actually served a huge purpose for humanity in seeing the truth. As tough as it is to say, without these events transpiring the way they have, we would be much more open to manipulation and deception, but as a result of some of these events, it’s created a counter-reaction of millions of people waking up and seeing through the lies. Again, there are multiple examples, like Libya. It all seems to be part of the deeper plan. A shift in consciousness is happening, and what’s encouraging is that it’s not just happening to us, me and you, but it’s also happening with individuals within the Deep State, within the realm of western politics. A great divide is occurring in the deep state and it’s causing many positive changes to this old regime. This is what’s needed, because at the end of the day, it’s a change within that has to occur within all individuals on this planet if we want to move forward together as one human race. One where our consciousness and perception of reality is our own, and not programmed into us. .

Read the full article at the original website

References:

Search Results

Bookmarks

MIT Professor Emeritus Claims Chemical Attacks In Syria Are Not Assad’s Doing

Search Results

Bookmarks

Subscribe to The Article Feed