You can quote several words to match them as a full term:
"some text to search"
otherwise, the single words will be understood as distinct search terms.
ANY of the entered words would match

No, China Did Not Just Take The Very First Pictures of The Dark Side of The Moon (See For Yourself)

China recently landed a probe on the dark side of the moon.Mainstream media claims that these are the first ever pictures taken, but that's false.

No, China Did Not Just Take The Very First Pictures of The Dark Side of The Moon (See For Yourself)

. It's the first time we've landed there, but we've seen photographs of this side in the past. Why are there so many examples and credible sources regarding what's happening on the back side of the moon, yet they go completely ignored by mainstream media? This makes no sense, what is going on here? An article on the popular website IFL Science reads, “These are the first images ever taken from the far side of the Moon.” The topic has to do with China’s space program, as they’ve landed the Change’e-4 probe in the Von Karman Crater in the Southern Hemisphere on the far side of the moon, the side that’s never visible from Earth.

There is one mistake that this media outlet and multiple other mainstream media outlets are making: These aren’t the first pictures of the dark side of the moon, it’s simply the first time we’ve ever landed on the dark side of the moon. However, even that may be questionable, given that there is a ‘secret space program‘ in existence. This became even more evident when $21 trillion dollars went missing from the Department of Defence. Investigations uncovered that these funds may be going towards black budget programs that “the commander in chief know nothing about.” (Paul Hellyer, Ex-Canadian Defence Minister) After the landing, the Chinese probe sent back images from the dark side of the moon. It’s no doubt a major milestone for space exploration.

The probe will also spend the coming months using its instruments to analyze the untouched surface, potentially helping scientists learn more about the structure and geology of the Moon, which is an area that scientists know little about. I recently wrote an article emphasizing this, illustrating how many reputable scientists have published papers and believe that the moon may actually be artificially made, suggesting that some sort of intelligence was behind its creation, and that it may be hollow. You can read that here. Now, I’d like to discuss why these aren’t the first images ever taken of the dark side of the moon. Members of the Society For Planetary SETI Research (SPSR) recently published a paper in the Journal of Space Exploration about certain features on the far side of the moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C.

The study argues that these features may be artificial in origin, meaning that perhaps another intelligent life form built them and put them there. One of the lead authors of that paper is the legendary Mark J. Carlotto. Carlotto is an aerospace engineer with over thirty years of experience in satellite imaging, remote sensing, signal and image processing, pattern recognition, and app development. He received a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University in 1981 and has published over one hundred technical articles and seven books. In the paper, the authors use an analysis of Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter images that were taken from Apollo 15, At first glance these structures appear to be walls or towers on the lunar surface. By combining multiple images, we show the larger feature, oriented in a northeast/southwest direction, is not simply a wall but two walls on either side of a narrow valley or “passageway”. Using single image shape from shading and 3D terrain visualization we show in a computer-generated perspective view looking northeast that the southwest end appears to be the entrance to the passageway. A reverse angle view looking southwest shows the passageway ending at a rise of terrain at the other end, possibly leading underground.

The terrain surrounding the two structures is not flat but appears “excavated” by some unknown mechanism, natural or artificial. That right there proves that these are not the first ever images taken of the back side of the moon; however, this is the first time we’ve landed a probe on the back side of the moon. Let’s not forget the 1994 Clementine Mission to the moon. This was part of a joint space project between the Ballistic Missile Defence Organization (BMDO) and NASA.

They made some fascinating discoveries, as the mission is known for discovering water at the moon’s poles.

The Deputy Manager for that mission, Dr. John Brandenburg, the inventor of the MET (Microwave Electro-Thermal) plasma thruster using water propellant for space propulsion, said that this mission was actually a photo reconnaissance mission to check out artificial structures that the government allegedly knew about on the back side of the moon. He made these statements in the documentary Aliens on the Moon. He also made some interesting statements in this lecture. He has many publications in various journals, and is clearly brilliant, but is made to look like a ‘fringe’ scientist or a complete quack.

There are now hundreds of people with similar backgrounds blowing the whistle on what’s really happening on the moon, which is why these recent pictures from China are concerning. China has released hundreds of images. At least the Guardian got it right. Martin Wiser, a scientist at the Swedish Institute of Space Physics and principal investigator on one of the instruments onboard the Chang’e, said: “We know the far side from orbital images and satellites, but we don’t know it from the surface. It’s unchartered territory and that makes it very exciting.” $21 trillion dollars were reported missing from the Pentagon. Michigan State professor and Economist, Mark Skidmore, and former assistant secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Catherine Austin Fitts, found that this money was going towards black budget programs. Fitts has been quite outspoken about a secret space program, and so have hundreds of others like the former Canadian Defence Minister Paul Hellyer, stating that there are trillions of dollars going into these black budget programs. When it comes to the moon, there is so much misinformation. You can learn more below: Multiple Scientists Publish Papers Suggesting The Moon Is Hollow & Artificially Made Dr. Steven Greer: “We Did Go To The Moon, But The Footage Was Fake.” Another Interesting Leak: A Second NASA Scientist Tells Us That ‘Somebody Else’ Is On The Moon A Wel Known CIA Pilot Claims That The Moon Has 250 Million Citizens Did Neil Armstrong & His Crew Encounter Extraterrestrials On The Moon For a long time, there has been misinformation and ridicule associated with UFO & Extraterrestrial phenomena, which in some cases may be separate issues. This was well illustrated by the very first Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter, who was quoted by the New York Times in 1960 stating that, “behind the scenes, high ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about UFOs, but through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe the unknown flying objects are nonsense.” Roscoe is one of hundreds of former high-ranking government employees to blow the whistle on what’s really going on. Below is another great testimony, which was from Victor Marchetti, a former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. We have indeed been contacted – perhaps even visited – by extraterrestrial beings, and the US government, in collusion with the other national powers of the Earth, is determined to keep this information from the general public. (Second Look, Volume 1, No 7, Washington, DC , May, 1979) Furthermore, there are many credible sources that have alluded to the fact that NASA commonly airbrushes photos. Norman Bergrun is a great example of that, and he is only one of multiple sources.

The fact of the matter is that something is clearly going on, and for decades it’s quite clear that there is a group of powerful people who do not want this information to be disclosed. Below is a picture that represents what I’m talking about, a photo we’ve never seen that comes from Bergrun. According to Bergrun, the pictures NASA got back from voyager in 1980 from Saturn were so mind-altering that they locked them up. This is a picture of a luminous source that seems to be intelligently controlled based on its movements. Here, it’s photographed hovering just outside of Saturn’s outer ring. You can fit multiple Earth’s inside the rings, so this craft seems to be about the size of our planet. Bergrun was a scientist and engineer and part of NASA’s voyager program. He worked at NASA for decades (at Ames Research Centre), and also worked at Lockheed Martin where he managed the Polaris missile tests. Norman got frustrated later in life that the decision was made not to tell the public what they photographed. He gave an illuminating interview in 2010 on this subject, and has travelled all the way to Scotland to get his book “The Ringmakers of Saturn” published. You can read more about that story here. Let this be an example of how we are only shown what they want us to see. There is still a lot of misinformation spread about UFO and Extraterrestrial phenomena, particularly within the mainstream media. You can check out the article below that goes into what’s going on right now with mainstream UFO disclosure: The US Government Just Admitted To Recovering Materials From UFOs – Here Are The Latest Updates It’s important to recognize how easy it is for the elite and space agencies to control and alter the narrative.

They choose what to disclose, and how to disclose it through mainstream media.

The recent lunar probe landing by China on the far side of the moon is a perfect example of that, as it could be used to debunk possible artificially made structures on the far side of the moon. What this means is that we have to do our own research and stay away from conventional sources that most of us use to find information. If we really want to know about something, and even offer an opinion about something, it’s best to look into it ourselves and utilize our critical thinking skills.

.

Read the full article at the original website

Subscribe to The Article Feed

Don’t miss out on the latest articles. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only articles.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe