Human Rights Watch welcomes the opportunity to provide input on the challenges and risks facing climate defenders for the upcoming report by the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association. While recognizing that climate defenders face threats in countries all over the world, we have chosen in this submission to focus largely on incidents and trends that we have documented in our prior research, namely in Brazil, France, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, and Uganda, including the experiences of Indigenous peoples, women, and children. Challenges of Climate Defenders to Exercising Assembly and Association Rights Killings, Intimidation, Discrimination, Disappearances, and Legal Harassment In Brazil, people put their lives at risk to protect the Amazon rainforest, one of the world’s most important carbon sinks. Criminal networks engaged in illegal deforestation use intimidation, threats, and violence against anyone who stands in their way by reporting their illegal activities, including Indigenous peoples, small-scale farmers, community leaders, and even environmental law enforcement agents. Human Rights Watch documented 28 killings—as well as four attempted killings and more than 40 death threats—linked to illegal deforestation, most of which occurred between 2015 and 2019.
The perpetrators in only two of these cases have been brought to trial. In Kenya’s Lamu county, activists have sought to raise awareness about the environmental, health, and climate impacts of a regional project known as LAPSSET, the Lamu Port-South Sudan-Ethiopia Transport corridor project which includes a proposed coal-fired power plant. According to Human Rights Watch research, in 2016 at least two activists in Lamu, an island on the Kenyan coast, were kidnapped by people believed to be police officers and are still missing. In Indonesia, women impacted by the palm oil industry’s deforestation practices have been excluded from community consultations regarding selling of their family land.
The specific impacts on women, including serious impacts on their human rights to a livelihood, access to food and water, and culture, went unheard and unaddressed. Similarly, many Indigenous peoples impacted by palm oil companies’ operations in Indonesia are not legally recognized and have only weak protects over their territories, which allows for deforestation and deprivation of their lands to continue relatively unchecked. In South Africa, communities across the country are raising concerns about the serious environmental, social, health, and climate harms of mining and coal-fired power plants. Human Rights Watch documented how, in many cases, such activism has been met with harassment, violence, or even killings.
The perpetrators of the attacks are often unknown, but activists believe that police, government officials, private security providers, or others apparently acting on behalf of mining companies may have facilitated them. South African police have failed to carry out adequate investigations for high-profile murders of environmental activists, including Sikhosiphi “Bazooka” Rhadebe in 2016 and Mama Fikile Ntshangase in 2020, which has left other environmental activists afraid to speak out. Community members in South Africa’s mining areas also described being assaulted, intimidated, threatened, and their property damaged. Companies have also weaponized courts against climate defenders using nuisance lawsuits.
These baseless lawsuits—known as “Strategic lawsuits against public participation,” or SLAPPs—are a tactic to suppress environmental defenders’ effectiveness by intimidating them and burdening them with onerous costs of mounting a legal defense. In South Africa, an Australian mining company sued environmental activists, attorneys, and a social worker for defamation in 2017 in relation to a statement they had made criticizing the human rights impacts of the company’s mining operations. In response to these tactics, the High Court in Cape Town issued a ruling in February 2021 holding that this suit constituted an abuse of the legal process. Restrictions of Peaceful Assembly and Association Rights In India, authorities arrested 21-year-old climate activist Disha Ravi in February 2021 on charges including sedition and criminal conspiracy for editing and sharing an online toolkit, shared by Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, aimed at providing information to those seeking to peacefully support the ongoing farmers protests. In granting bail to Ravi, the Delhi court called the evidence against her “scanty and sketchy.” This arrest was the latest in the Indian government’s long line of efforts to silence criticism, including by targeting independent journalism, filing baseless criminal charges, arresting student protesters, and pressing social media companies to block critical content. In France, police used teargas from very close range against climate activists staging a peaceful sit-in in 2019. In Kenya, police in Lamu often violently break up meetings and peaceful protests, arrest activists, and charge them with crimes, such as incitement, participating in an illegal assembly, trespassing on government land, and resisting arrest. Human Rights Watch researchers found at least ten cases in which individual activists have faced prosecution for criminal offenses for acts such as talking to the press or holding meetings with residents of potentially impacted communities. In most cases, charges were dropped for lack of evidence, but often only after suspects were detained longer than the 24-hour period that Kenya’s constitution permits. Human Rights Watch documented 13 cases of arbitrary detention and interrogation of activists by police in Lamu between 2013 and 2018.
The government also increased surveillance and crackdowns on rights organizations and activists in regions with predominantly Muslim populations, especially between 2013 and 2016, which led to increased surveillance of environmental activists. In Uganda, police arrested and detained for eight hours eight youth climate activists while participating in the global climate strike on September 25, 2020 in Kampala.
The police told them election campaigns were not allowed, although the activists repeatedly explained that they were an environmental—not a political—movement.
The activists, only two of whom were above the age of 18, were detained in a room for eight hours, questioned, and then allowed to leave. In South Africa, municipalities often create obstacles to assembly that have no basis in law, including giving communities the impression that all protests need to be approved—which is not true under South African law—or where a mining company is involved, requiring communities to provide documentation of prior engagement with the mining company. Police have also injured peaceful protestors using teargas and rubber bullets to disperse anti-mining protests or have arrested community members on grounds such as “public violence” or “malicious damage to property.” In some cases, police have not investigated these incidents or have delayed investigations. False Accusations of “Ecoterrorism,” Extremism, and “Threats to National Security” In Kenya, HRW documented 15 cases in a three-year period of environmental defenders who spoke out against the LAPSSET development in Lamu being accused of having ties to al-Shabab. In Kenya, the government has also attempted to severely limit foreign funding to civil society groups—especially environmental groups. In Russia, at least 14 environmental groups have had to stop work in recent years, as a result of Russia’s Law on Foreign Agents.
The law requires any Russian group accepting foreign funding and carrying out activities that the Russian government deems “political” to register as a “foreign agent,” which in Russia connotes “spy” or “traitor.” Russian officials labeled Greenpeace Russia an extremist group, and an activist with Stop GOK, a Russian group seeking to block mining and enrichment plants, was fined in April 2019 for “mass distribution of extremist materials” because he published a poem on Stop GOK’s social media page, which the government had banned as extremist in 2012. Authoritarian governments have sought to label environmental groups and climate activists as unpatriotic radicals that pose a threat to the state. In 2018, Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte placed 600 civil society members, including environmental and Indigenous rights defenders, on a list of alleged members of the country’s communist party and its armed wing, which Duterte has declared a terrorist organization.
The included Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, an indigenous Filipina who is the UN special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples and a climate change activist. A Manila court ordered the government to remove Tauli-Corpuz from the list, but a Philippines military official renewed the campaign against her, accusing her of “infiltrating” the UN for the communist insurgents. Counterterrorism laws have also been used to suppress protest during major climate summits. In Poland, authorities denied entry to at least 13 climate activists during COP24 in 2018, contending that they posed a threat to national security.
The government also issued a new law in advance of COP24 specifically aimed at restricting freedom of assembly during the climate summit in the name of national security.
The law gave police and secret services sweeping surveillance powers to obtain, collect, and analyze personal data about registered conference participants or people associated with its organization, without judicial oversight or their knowledge and consent.
The law explicitly banned spontaneous protests during the climate summit.
The Polish government had previously changed the law to support demonstrations of which it approves while banning related counter-protests. Polish authorities responded to criticism of the law by citing a French law that issued a total ban on protests related to COP21 in Paris. However, the Polish ban was not a reaction to a concrete security threat.
The French authorities had banned protests at COP21 as part of a formally declared state of emergency in response to the deadly November 2015 attacks in Paris just weeks earlier that were claimed by the Islamic State. But France also abused those sweeping emergency powers, placing at least 24 climate activists under house arrest without judicial warrant, raiding activists’ homes, and seizing computers and personal belongings. Recommendations for States Recommendations for Businesses Recommendations for Multilateral Institutions .
Read the full article at the original website