From ... in Alternative News — Jun 27, 2016

Why You Shouldn’t Be Sharing These Fake ‘Chemtrail’ Photos Online

Are these photos really from inside ‘chemtrail’ planes? Not according to several books published in the 60’s and 90’s, these are ballast barrels that were used to simulate passengers during test flights. But would this mean chemtrails and geoengineering isn’t real? No, but unforutnately debates over pictures like these pull credibility away from the subject.

The point of people posting stuff like this is to encourage people to become aware of and start thinking about the ‘chemtrail’ phenomenon, and what’s commonly known as geo-engineering, which is indeed very real. But one big problem in the alternative media world right now is that a lot gets shared without providing any sort of credible evidence to back it up. This unfortunately creates doubt and a lack of credibility for the movement around issues that do have merit and are true.

These articles that are floating around the web in abundance, do more harm than good sometimes, and discredit the movement towards truth by subjecting it to more ridicule. Simply writing an article and placing these pictures inside of them, with no credible source for their origin, is a great example of why so many people instantly discredit geoengineering, among other topics. If you want to create awareness, it’s best to do so with credible sources, evidence, and critical questioning. Chemtrails are very real, and the last thing that’s needed is an article with pictures (that provide no sources) without any real information on the phenomenon itself. So, if you’d like to learn more, you can access the articles linked below. We’ve written several articles on the subject that can provide you with more information if interested. “Chemtrails,” a popular name used to identify trails that have been seen by hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people around the world.

These are no ordinary ‘contrails,’ they don’t disappear, but rather, stay in the sky and stretch out throughout the day, creating a blanket that, on some days, completely blocks the sun. This is an important issue, especially if you’re concerned about global climate change. Many organizations and people with a voice have been trying to create awareness, from Collective-Evolution to various politicians, climate activists, scientists, and professors. Not long ago, HRH Princess Basmah Bint Saud, humanitarian and daughter of King Saud, compared geoengineering science and programs to weapons of mass destruction, arguing that their implementation is like setting off a bomb without the nuclear explosion. “Chemtrails” are slowly but surely leaving the ‘conspiracy theory’ realm. For those of you who don’t know, the term used today is “geoengineering,” and skeptics seem to be quite hesitant to accept the idea that geoengineering is actually operational.

The idea of geoengineering has been around for a while. It was even used in the 2008 Olympic games in Beijing. Hughes Aircraft Company even has a patent dating back more than twenty years ago, to 1990. You can take a look at it here. It contains 18 ways to reduce global warming through stratospheric seeding with aluminum oxide, thorium oxide, and refractory Welsbach material. If we look at SPICE, a United Kingdom government funded geoengineering research project that collaborates with the Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburgh, and Bristol, some of the proposed particles to spray in the air include sulphate, sulphuric acid, sulphur dioxide, titania, silicon carbide, alumina, zinc oxide, and more. A 1996 report conducted by top military personnel in the U.S., titled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” reveals the supposed urgency to implement these programs: Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability. In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. As you can see, this is a national security issue, so if these programs are indeed operational, they would remain classified given the fact that they are in the hands of the department of defence. A wealth of evidence exists to suggest that these programs are already operational, and we’ve written a number of well-sourced articles that show why so many people believe this to be true, apart from basic observation of our skies for a day. Below are a list of articles that go into much more detail about chemtrails and geoengineering for those of you who are looking to further your knowledge, or to simply see why so many people are concerned about this topic: If You Think These Are Just “Contrails” Think Again – Here’s What They Really Are Top Climate Scientist Warns Against Injecting Stratospheric Particles Into The Atmosphere Nuclear Chemist Publishes Groundbreaking Paper With Details About: Aluminum Poisoning Of Humanity VIA Geoengineering Chemtrails Discussed At United Nations Hearing On Global Warming Saudi Princess Compares Geoengineering To A “Weapon Of Mass Destruction.” Pilots, Doctors Scientists Tell The Truth About Chemtrails/Geo-Engineering Neurosurgeon Voices Health Concerns Over Geoengineering Chemtrails ***Please keep in mind that these photos are not from verified sources. You can find many of them floating around on the internet, and that doesn’t mean they are real or not real. We chose to write this article and use these pictures/title to bring more awareness and attention to to the geoengineering issue. .

Read the full article at the original website

References:

Search Results

Bookmarks

Why You Shouldn’t Be Sharing These Fake ‘Chemtrail’ Photos Online

Search Results

Bookmarks

Subscribe to The Article Feed