Harvard Ponders What “Dose” of Aerosols To Spray Into Earth’s Atmosphere For Their Geoengineering Program
Harvard recently published a study examining what would be the right 'dose' of aerosols to spray into the atmosphere in order, according to them, reflect the sunlight away from the planet.
Have spraying programs already been in place? Is global warming being used as justification to spray openly when it is really for some other purpose? Why does mainstream media never mention geoengineering? What is geoengineering? Well, some refer to it as a weapon of mass destruction, others within the mainstream and other powerful organizations like the Central Intelligence Agency heavily support the practice of geoengineering, which is the process of spraying an array of aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect the sunlight away from Earth in order to combat global warming. Global warming, I must mention, is a highly politicized topic, with top climate scientists warning about this politicization of the science and urging the public to realize that a lot of what we are seeing from mainstream media is climate hysteria. Here is one of many examples. This distracts us from focusing on important things, like cleaning up our planet, the waterways, and re-forestation. Instead, it keeps us focused on CO2 and the systems that are being put into place to put more money in the pockets of politicians. All this comes from a mass media campaign that makes people seem ‘stupid’ or silly for questioning the global warming narrative, when again, many top climate scientists have been questioning it for years. It’s handled in a similar way to the vaccine issue. Related CE Article: 97 % of Scientists Don’t Agree on the Cause of Climate Change, But They Do Agree on Some Things I would hope that those who do support the global warming narrative wake up to the fact that it’s also being used to justify mass geoengineering projects, which some people believe have already been in operation for a long time. For example, Dr. Marvin Herndon, PhD., a nuclear chemist, geochemist, and cosmochemist – most noted for deducing the composition of the inner core of Earth as being nickel silicide, not partially crystallized nickel-iron metal – published a paper in the peer-reviewed journal Current Science (Indian Academy of Sciences) titled “Aluminum poisoning of humanity and Earth’s biota by clandestine geoengineering activity: implications for India.”(source) A United States government document printed at the request of the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in November of 1978 states: In addition to specific research programs sponsored by Federal agencies, there are other functions related to weather modification which are performed in several places in the executive branch. Various federal advisory panels and committees and their staffs – established to conduct in-depth studies and prepare comprehensive reports, to provide advice or recommendations, or to coordinate Federal weather modification programs – have been housed and supported within executive departments, agencies, or offices. So, as you can see, this is no joke.
There are too many examples to name. Just a couple years ago, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) published a review stating that Harvard scientists are moving forward with plans for atmospheric geoengineering experiments.
The researchers intend to launch a high-altitude balloon that would spray a small quantity of reflective particles into the atmosphere in a proposed plan to combat global warming. According to the MIT review, “They would be among the earliest official geoengineering-related experiments conducted outside of a controlled laboratory or computer model, underscoring the growing sense of urgency among scientists to begin seriously studying the possibility as the threat of climate change mounts.” Based on our research here at Collective Evolution, that statement isn’t true. After all, according to the World Meteorological Association: “In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.” Now, Harvard has published a paper that emphasized the importance of finding the right “dose” for solar geoengineering.
They are talking about the right dose of aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and reduce global warming. What type of aerosols? SPICE is a UK government-funded geoengineering research project in collaboration with the University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, University of Edinburgh, and University of Bristol to further examine the idea of Solar Radiation Management (SRM).
They give a good overview by listing some candidate particles on their website.
They include: sulphuric acid, titania, alumina, silica, zinc oxide calcium carbonate and more.
The latest news from Harvard states: New research from the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS), in collaboration with MIT and Princeton University, finds that if solar geoengineering is used to cut global temperature increases in half, there could be worldwide benefits without exacerbating change in any large geographic area. “The analogy is not perfect but solar geoengineering is a little like a drug which treats high-blood pressure,” said Irvine. “An overdose would be harmful, but a well-chosen dose could reduce your risks. Of course, it’s better to not have high-blood pressure in the first place but once you have it, along with making healthier lifestyle choices, it’s worth considering treatments that could lower your risks.” Again, this all stems from non-scientific claims that there are drastic changes in the Earth’s temperature that could cause a doomsday scenario. Harvard’s latest research was published in in Nature Climate Change. One of the authors of this paper is David W. Keith. He’s a professor of Applied Physics for the Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS). He’s also a professor at Harvard University and Chairman of Carbon Engineering. His research, which is again also cited in the Harvard report above, includes a lot of work on climate-related technology assessment and policy. When asked about the spraying of these heavy metals into the atmosphere, of which millions of tonnes would have to be used, he said: “You may end up killing many ten’s of thousands of people a year as a direct results of that decision.” (source) I am confused as to why this type of thing is even being considered an option, I agree with HRH Princess Basmah Bint Saud, who stressed that geoengineering threatens the world’s water and food supply, and is one of the tools of the “new power” in the world and is used as a weapon of mass destruction. (source) Geoengineering is something we have to continue to be vocal about. Developments have been in the works for a number of years, yet very little awareness about it has been created. This is something that must be stopped. We plan to investigate the telecom industry, it’s ties to politics, and expose its efforts to push 5G while ignoring the dangers and without proper safety testing, but we can't do it without your support. We've launched a funding campaign to fuel our efforts on this matter as we are confident we can make a difference and have a strong plan to get it done. Check out our plan and join our camp.
Read the full article at the original website