Tulsi Gabbard: “DNC And Corporate Media Are Rigging The Election Again”
In a new video, Tulsi Gabbard exposes the reality of the rigging of the election process in the US, she considers boycotting the debate process.
Do we really have a say in elections? Do we even have a say over key issues that don't get voted on? Does our political process truly represent people? Is it time to explore a new process? Non-establishment candidates like Tulsi Gabbard, Andrew Yang and Marianne Williamson are important for the very reason that they help to reveal the corrupt processes of elections and who the players involved are. As we have said with Trump, if he did not become president, it would be business as usual with Hillary and many may not have begun to wise up to the shadow government battle that has ensued over the last 4 years, one that is revealing who’s really in control of the US government. All drama aside, which is a trap one can fall into, the last 4 years have been a very helpful collective process for people to wake up to the type of system they agree to live within. Now, Tulsi Gabbard is making that even more clear in what I honestly feel is a very inspiring video she released on her YouTube channel earlier today. As we covered in deep detail in 2015 and 2016, it was clear the corporate media shadow government was involved in rigging the election to push Bernie Sanders out of the picture so establishment and deep state figurehead Hillary Clinton would have a chance at the presidency. It’s now happening again, and hopefully this time, the American people see the system they participate in more clearly now than ever. As we have often stated, the political system we have at the moment is not at all broken. Some people think it is, but it isn’t. It is designed this way, to be able to manipulate elections so whoever is ‘supposed’ to be in power will be.
The sooner people realize that the sooner we know where we stand and how we can move forward. This process is very much a conscious awakening that moves us from a mode of not seeing, to seeing very clearly the world we truly live in. We call this Breaking The Illusion in the first step of the CE Protocol. Have a listen to Tulsi Gabbard as she helps break the illusion about the 2020 election process. It’s important to note Tulsi is considering boycotting the upcoming debate on October 15th. You can read the transcript of her video below if you prefer. I highly recommend checking out the following video I created as well to get a better handle on what we need to understand when hearing things like what Tulsi is saying below. I want to thank you all very much for your support. I need to share something with you. It is very important.
There are so many of you who I’ve met in Iowa and New Hampshire who have expressed to me how frustrated you are that the DNC and corporate media are essentially trying to usurp your role as voters in choosing who our Democratic nominee will be. I share your concerns, and I’m sure that all our supporters throughout the country do as well.
The 2016 Democratic Primary election was rigged by the DNC and their partners in the corporate media against Bernie Sanders. In this 2020 election, the DNC and corporate media are rigging the election again, but this time against the American people in the early voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada.
They are attempting to replace the roles of voters in the early states, using polling and other arbitrary methods which are not transparent or democratic, and holding so-called debates which are not debates at all but rather commercialized reality television meant to entertain, not inform or enlighten. In short, the DNC and corporate media are trying to hijack the entire election process. In order to bring attention to this serious threat to our democracy, and ensure your voice is heard, I am giving serious consideration to boycotting the next debate on October 15th. I will announce my decision within the next few days. With my deepest aloha, thank you all again for your support.
Read the full article at the original website
References:
