It held on to that reputation all the way up to the day Russia invaded, at which point media worldwide suddenly started rewriting history.
Whitewashing Ukraine's Corruption and Authoritarianism
As noted by Ted Galen Carpenter, a senior fellow for defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, in a sober and clear-eyed article, published in April 2022:
"Statements from U.S. and other Western oficials, as well as pervasiveaccounts in the news media, have created a stunningly misleading image ofUkraine. There has been a concerted effort to portray the country not only as avictim of brutal Russian aggression, but as a plucky and noble bulwark offreedom and democracy ...The promoters of that narrative contend that the ongoing war is not just aquarrel between Russia and Ukraine over Kiev's ambitions to join NATO andMoscow's territorial claims in Crimea and the Donbas. No, they insist — the waris part of a global struggle between democracy and authoritarianism ...The notion that Ukraine was such an appealing democratic model in EasternEurope that the country's mere existence terrified Putin may be a comfortingmyth to U.S. politicians and pundits, but it is a myth. Ukraine is far from being ademocratic-capitalist model ...The reality is murkier and troubling: Ukraine has long been one of the morecorrupt countries in the international system ... Ukraine's track record ofprotecting democracy and civil liberties is not much better than its performanceon corruption. In Freedom House's 2022 report, Ukraine is listed in the 'partlyfree' category, with a score of 61 out of a possible 100 ...Even before the war erupted, there were ugly examples of authoritarianism inUkraine's political governance ... The neo-Nazi Azov Battalion was an integral12
part of President Petro Poroshenko's military and security apparatus, and it hasretained that role during Zelensky's presidency ...[O]ne can condemn Putin's actions and even cheer on Ukraine's militaryresistance without fostering a false image of Ukraine's political system. Thecountry is not a symbol of freedom and liberal democracy, and the war is not anexistential struggle between democracy and authoritarianism. At best, Ukraineis a corrupt, quasi-democratic entity with troubling repressive policies.Given that sobering reality, calls for Americans to 'stand with Ukraine' aremisplaced. Preserving Ukraine's independence and territorial integrity mostcertainly are not worth the United States risking war with a nuclear-armedRussia."
Media 'Rediscovers' Ukraine's Corrupt Past
Given how mainstream media have been fawning over Zelensky, picturing him as a fierce fighter for democracy, it was surprising to see The Associated Press and NPR suddenly revisiting Ukraine's history of corruption. A July 20, 2022, article, originally published by AP and republished by NPR, states:
"Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's dismissal of senior oficials iscasting an inconvenient light on an issue that the Biden administration haslargely ignored since the outbreak of war with Russia: Ukraine's history oframpant corruption and shaky governance.As it presses ahead with providing tens of billions of dollars in military,economic and direct financial support aid to Ukraine and encourages its alliesto do the same, the Biden administration is now once again grappling withlongstanding worries about Ukraine's suitability as a recipient of massiveinfusions of American aid."
The sudden critique comes on the heels of Zelensky's firing of his top prosecutor, his intelligence chief and several other senior oficials, claiming they are spies or3
collaborators with Russia. Zelensky has also dragged his feet when it comes to assigning a new anti-corruption prosecutor, something that should have occurred last December, and which, according to the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, "undermines the work of anti-corruption agencies."
Zelensky Blacklists Americans After Getting Millions FromTaxpayers
A few days after firing his top oficials, Zelensky's Center for Countering Disinformation — established in 2021 — also issued a blacklist of American "pro-Russian propagandists," which includes Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky, former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D- Hawaii, independent journalist Glenn Greenwald, retired Col. Douglas Macgregor and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer. As noted by Fox News host Tucker Carlson, "Now the Ukrainian government has decided that they can impose censorship in our country." Carlson questioned how President Biden can possibly claim that we're "defending democracy" by sending millions of American taxpayer dollars to Ukraine. This is being done while Zelensky bans all opposition parties — 11 in all — and blacklists American politicians and journalists who question the use of U.S. taxpayer funds and our involvement in the Ukraine confiict. It rather appears we're aiding authoritarianism, doesn't it? Greenwald, who appeared on Carlson's show to discuss the blacklisting stated:
"The Ukrainians have a confiict with this neighboring country in Russia. They'retotally free to pursue whatever war policies they want. They can fight Russia inthe next 10 years if they choose. But that's not what they're doing.They're begging and in a sense, demanding that other countries, including myown, the United States, provide them with a seemingly endless supply ofweapons and money, which means we not only have the right, but the obligation456
to debate that and ask whether that's in the interest of the American people todo."
Ukraine Is No Defender of Democracy
In the video at the top of this article, I've included three episodes of "The Jimmy Dore Show" in which Dore discusses this and other news surrounding the Ukraine war. In the first segment, he reviews past news articles discussing Ukraine's corruption. Repeatedly, in 2014, 2015 and beyond, Ukraine was declared the most corrupt country in Europe. In the second segment, Dore reviews how Zelensky was supposed to clean out corruption and usher in a new era of good governance. That didn't happen though. The Panama Papers — described as "a giant leak of more than 11.5 million financial and legal records [which] exposes a system that enables crime, corruption and wrongdoing" — have revealed Zelensky, his wife and several associates own "hidden offshore assets," raising suspicions that Zelensky may be just as corrupt as his forerunners. The third Dore Show segment reviews Ukraines' blacklist of pro-Russian journalists, which, as mentioned, includes Greenwald, Scott Ritter, Jeffrey David Sachs and many others. The beauty of being discredited by mainstream media is that they revealed to you who is actually telling the truth.
What Happens to US Weapons in Ukraine?
One wonders whether the U.S. "aid" to Ukraine might also be a corrupt scheme in and of itself. As admitted by CNN, the U.S. government doesn't know what happens to the billions of dollars' worth of military hardware and munitions shipped to Ukraine. The supplies cannot be tracked, and the obvious risk is that the weapons can end up in the hands of militias and terrorists. However, this is "a conscious risk the Biden789
administration is willing to take," CNN says. In the meantime, the U.S. and NATO are simply shipping over whatever Zelensky claims he needs. According to CNN:
"Trucks loaded with pallets of arms provided by the Defense Department arepicked up by Ukrainian armed forces — primarily in Poland — and then driveninto Ukraine, Kirby said, 'then it's up to the Ukrainians to determine where theygo and how they're allocated inside their country.'"
Theft Through Endless Warfare
As noted by Wikileaks founder Julian Assange in 2011, the purpose of the Afghan war — the longest war in U.S. history, which lasted from 1999 until 2021 — was not to subjugate Afghanistan. It was to launder money through war.
"The goal was to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax base of theUnited States, out of the tax bases of the European countries, throughAfghanistan, back into the hands of transnational security elite. That is the goal.I.e., the goal is to have an endless war; not a successful war,"
Assange said. Is Ukraine just another repeat of this same scheme? It's starting to look that way. Rather than sending diplomats and urging Ukraine to negotiate peace, the NATO alliance insists Ukraine fight to the last man, and send weapons and financial aid that quickly vanish into a proverbial black hole.
What's the Goal in Helping Ukraine?
The problem facing NATO and the U.S. is that people are increasingly becoming aware of the fact that things don't add up. Why are we involved in this confiict? We're clearly not defending "democracy"; quite the opposite. We're aiding and abetting an authoritarian regime — and actual real-world Nazi adherents. As reported by Jeff Childers, president and founder of the Childers Law firm, in a July 19, 2022 blog post:101112
"The Economist ran a story yesterday headlined, 'Is America Growing Weary ofthe Long War In Ukraine?' Well. I was immediately suspicious, because theUkraine war hasn't been that long ...Late in the article, the Economist put its tobacco-stained finger right on thesquidge that marks the real problem: 'Mr. Biden's aim in the war is unclear. Hisadministration has stopped talking about helping Ukraine to 'win,' and insteadspeaks of preventing it from being defeated.'That's the problem, all right. What IS the goal, Joe? If it's 'winning,' what doesthat even look like and how do we get there? ... It seems the pro-war Ukrainianswant the U.S. to just skip the messy middle and jump right into direct war withthe Russians, to teach them a lesson or something.But the Russians have nuclear missiles and doomsday submarines and evennuclear torpoedos for goodness' sake. A fully-kinetic global war won't help theUkrainians, at all. Probably just the opposite. It's magical thinking."
The Rise of Totalitarianism in America
The U.S. support of an authoritarian regime like Ukraine is perhaps best explained by the realization that the U.S. itself has shifted in that direction. According to American philosopher, social critic and cognitive scientist Noam Chomsky, who appeared on Russell Brand's podcast in July 2022, the U.S. is "living under a kind of totalitarian culture, which has never existed in my lifetime and is much worse in many ways than the Soviet Union before (Mikhail) Gorbachev." The cause for this cultural change, Chomsky believes, can be traced back to the censorship of global news. Basically, most Americans live in an echo chamber, where there's no diversity of views, especially not from perceived adversaries:
"If today in the United States, you want to find out what Minister (Sergey) Lavrovof Russia is saying, you can't do it. It's barred. Americans are not permitted to13
hear what Russians are saying,"
Chomsky told Brand.
"Can't get Russiantelevision, can't access Russian sources ...You wanna find out what the adversaries are saying, which is of utmostimportance … But the United States has imposed constraints on freedom ofaccess information, which are astonishing and which in fact go beyond whatwas the case in post (Joseph) Stalin and Soviet Russia."
The Biolab Angle
Another angle that can help explain the U.S. support of a clearly authoritarian and anti- democratic regime is the fact that we have a number of biolabs in Ukraine, the purposes of which the U.S. government is keen to obscure. Childers addresses this as well:
"The next story may possibly be the most significant news I've ever reported,and I don't think I'm exaggerating. The news is that Deputy Chairwoman of theRussian State Duma (congress) Irina Yarovaya gave an update yesterday onRussia's oficial investigation into US Biolabs in Ukraine.What the Russians are saying isn't pretty. And they claim to have a mountain ofevidence. So far, the U.S. has not deigned to respond to any of the deadlyserious allegations.Remember that back in May, the Russians presented evidence to the U.N.Security Council arguing that the U.S. had been performing illegal bioweaponsdevelopment — AND TESTING — in Ukraine, including accusing the last threeDemocrat administrations of working with George Soros, Bill Gates, and bigpharma to break treaties, develop illegal weapons technology, releasebioweapons into Ukraine, test the weapons on soldiers and mental patients, and— most significantly — infect the Russian people and crops ...A remarkable diagram shows all the alleged players that goes far beyond thosenamed above, and includes Pfizer, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, andothers.14
The Russians accused the top Democrats of facilitating the illegal research formilitary purposes in league with big pharma, which was brought in wheneverthere were tests or leaks, to develop lucrative treatments for the new diseases.In return, argued the Russians, big pharma funneled massive campaigncontributions back to Democrats, making a sinister and demonic viral feedbackloop."
According to Yarovaya, the key masterminds of this conspiracy include the U.S. Democratic party, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and George Soros. The U.S. government, meanwhile, has done nothing to counter these Russian allegations, other than dismiss them as "Russian misinformation" unworthy of so much as a reply.
Because the Russians are naming specificindividuals, it is starting to look like the Russians planto launch a Nuremberg-style international criminalcomplaint along the lines that so many Americanshave been wishing for. ~ Jeff Childers
Childers suspects Biden's attempt to set up a Disinformation Governance Board might even have been an "effort to screw an even tighter lid" on the biolabs story, seeing how Nina Jankowicz, selected to lead the board, previously worked for Zelensky himself. She also worked for the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry.
Russian Report to Drop Before the US Midterms
According to Yarovaya, the Russian government intends to release a comprehensive report about the U.S. biolabs in Ukraine sometime before the U.S. midterm elections. In her July 18, 2022, status update to the Russian legislature, she stated:
"As evidence today, the parliamentary commission may already present thefacts that bio laboratories supervised by the Pentagon on the territory ofUkraine did not meet safety criteria. In the current mode of their activity, theyposed and pose a colossal threat for citizens of Ukraine and for the wholeworld.The facility was not only insecure. Despite the fact that they were working withdangerous viruses and pathogens, there was also a leak. It is quite likely thatthis explains the growth of epidemics in Ukraine.But most likely, those who created these laboratories were interested inensuring [they] were not adequately protected, not only for corruption, but alsoin order to carry out a live experiment; in this way, to monitor what the reactionfrom the population would be, what the mortality rate would be, what theconsequences would be."
Russians Accuse US of Intentional Negligence1516
To be clear, the Russians are accusing the U.S. of intentional negligence, which is no small matter. As noted by Childers, the same thing appears to have happened in Wuhan. From 2018 onward, the U.S. State Department issued reports in which investigators warned the lab was poorly run and primed for an accident. Fast-forward to late 2019, and SARS-CoV-2 mysteriously emerged right in the vicinity of that same lab. Now, any oficial that admits COVID was or might be the result of a lab leak is also careful to say that it must have been an accident. But if a lab is intentionally negligent, is a subsequent leak really accidental? The point the Russians seem to make is that it's not accidental at all. However, intentional neglect allows the responsible party to pretend that an intentional release was accidental. That way, they're not guilty of a crime. But that's not all. Childers continues:
"The Russians also alleged that the U.S. culprits are hiding behind 'animalresearch;' further concealing their guilt by genetically grafting human infectioncapabilities onto existing animal viruses, so they can claim natural origins forthe newly-developed bugs. Like with COVID. Or monkeypox ...Yarovaya said the result of all this intentional negligence has been 'unforeseensituations all over the world.' She fingered the U.S. for the novel monkeypoxoutbreak. 'Everything related to coronavirus, monkey pox, should be searched inthe test tubes of American laboratories,' she said.By a totally random coincidence, the very same Wuhan Institute of Virologywhere COVID was developed was also experimenting with monkeypox ...Because the Russians are naming specific individuals, it is starting to look likethe Russians plan to launch a Nuremberg-style international criminal complaintalong the lines that so many Americans have been wishing for."
'Game of Nuclear Chicken'17
If Childers suspicion that the Russians are planning a Nuremberg-style complaint, it's no wonder the U.S. government is trying to keep a lid on the accusations, even at the risk of having their silence appear incriminating in and of itself. Childers also believes China may join with Russia in this effort, as Russia's justification for invading Ukraine to take down dangerous biolabs would also "create a neat justification for a Chinese invasion of Taiwan." As it turns out, Taiwan is home to a staggering 1,251 biolabs that serve "medical, agricultural, food and environmental needs." At least 31 of those labs work with "virology, bacteriology, parasitology, mycology and vector biology," and one, a biosecurity level 4 (BSL4) lab in northern Taiwan belongs to the military. So, China could easily justify an invasion of Taiwan by saying there are unsecured biowarfare facilities there.
"All these allegations — completely ignored by corporate media — are incrediblyserious,"
"The Russians are accusing the U.S. of a biologicalweapons of mass destruction attack. It has long been the oficial policy of theU.S. that a bioweapons attack is equivalent to a nuclear attack, and wouldjustify a nuclear response.It doesn't matter whether they're right. The Russians appear to believe they arelegally justified in retaliating against the U.S. using weapons of massdestruction. And they're building the case using a lot of shady stuff that the U.S.and its deep-state corporate allies have been up to.It sure would be a good time for the U.S. government to speak up and get totallytransparent about the legitimate purpose behind all these labs. Assuming thereIS a legitimate purpose.But perpetrators, whoever they are, would almost certainly risk nuclear war toprotect their secrets if only half of what the Russians are saying is true. So,wittingly or not, we are all involved in a deadly game of nuclear chicken. And ourdriver is Joe Biden."18
Is There a Way Out?
In an interview with Lex Friedman, filmmaker Oliver Stone discussed the history of corruption in Ukraine — detailed in his film " Ukraine on Fire " — the propaganda surrounding the current Russia-Ukraine confiict, and his understanding of why Russia is acting the way it is. At the end of that interview, Friedman asked Stone whether he thinks we can walk back from the brink of nuclear war. Stone replied:
"Yes, [through] reason ... and then diplomacy. Talk to the guy. Mr. Biden, whydon't you calm down and go talk to Mr. Putin in Moscow. And try to have adiscussion without falling into ideologies."
Assuming the U.S. government in general and Biden in particular are not embroiled in criminal biowarfare activity in Ukraine, then Stone's suggestion is reasonable. However, if their actions are based on a need to protect a dirty secret (or two), then diplomacy wouldn't even be on the menu of options. Russia would probably want its pound of fiesh. They would want justice to be settled, which in the case of illegal biowarfare manufacturing could include the lifelong incarceration of certain individuals. Seeing how Biden is on Russia's list of "key mastermind conspirators," it seems reasonable to assume he wouldn't easily be let off the hook. And that brings us right back to Childers' prediction, which is that the perpetrators "would almost certainly risk nuclear war to protect their secrets if only half of what the Russians are saying is true." So, while World War III has so far been an information war waged against the public, nuclear war between nations is still a possibility — thanks to corruption at the highest levels, which prevents diplomatic solutions.
Read the full article at the original website