Why Green Party Politicians Are Now Shills For The Global Elite’s Mass Immigration Policy

Is it getting easier to see how the push for mass migration is a tactic of the Global Elite to get them closer to their goal of totalitarian global rule? Gone are the days when Green parties were a group of people who simply wanted to protect the environment, and multiculturalism was motivated by a desire to demonstrate that people of different cultures could live together in harmony. Green party leaders were naive idealists who didn’t really have any cohesive political ideology. Those days are long gone. Today, many Green party leaders seem to have either been installed by the Global Elite or ‘persuaded’ to follow their political ideology. This is yet another clear example of how Big Money and Big Power infiltrate our institutions in any way they can to serve the Global Elite’s agenda. Remember how American Green party leader Jill Stein seemed to come out of nowhere to make a big fuss about having a recount in the 2016 election? She was able to somehow raise $7 million for the cause that ultimately didn’t come into fruition. But the fact that she would make such an effort to have Deep State candidate Hillary Clinton supplant Donald Trump as President of the United States really says it all. A particular strategy on the part of the Global Elite has recently surfaced in the minds of those paying attention, and we are slowly realizing how it has long been hidden behind the guise of ‘mutual acceptance and respect between cultures’. Carefully crafted to label any opposition as ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobic,’ this strategy of mass immigration is part of an effort to destabilize nations not only by destroying the cultural fabric and identity of each nation, but also by inciting criminal activity and racial tensions. This push is exemplified by the United Nation’s ‘Global Migration Pact,’ which in and of itself gives more power to a central global authority and less power to nations.

The end goal? The erosion of the sovereignty and security of nations and the creation of a situation in which global rulership, with its false promise of bringing peace and prosperity, actually becomes something that citizens of beleaguered nations might be convinced to go along with. Refugee migration is an important prong of this strategy. First, the Global Elite destabilizes sovereign countries like Syria, bringing Deep State-created and -funded ‘terrorist groups’ (read: well-paid mercenaries) to cause havoc and suffering.

Then, they orchestrate a highly organized mass migration of refugees to Europe, making these frightened people think they have no other choice but to leave their home amid false promises of a better life.

Then, they pit all of us against each other. Those who are simply thinking and acting out of compassion for these displaced populations end up fighting against those who see that while many refugees are completely innocent, there is evil intent behind the overall plan. If world leaders really cared about these people, would they not have pooled their military resources and defeated all vestiges of organized terrorism in Syria so that all of those refugees would be safe to stay home? Does anyone doubt that if the political will was there, this problem could have been handled in a matter of days? Clearly, the world has been deceived about the true nature of the refugee crisis. People of good conscience would want to do everything they could for those innocent people who have been displaced from their home country. But in order to address the matter properly, countries cannot allow themselves to completely open their borders and try to handle demands they have no resources for. Of course many of the heads of state have no problem trying to look like the hero by welcoming masses of people into the country at the expense of its own citizens, but currently their motive is not compassion but their adherence to the Global Elite’s ‘open borders’ agenda. In my article ‘Dalai Lama Sparks Outrage With Remarks On Refugee Crisis: But Is He Right?‘, I make the argument that while the elimination of borders and the bringing together of citizens of all nations as ‘one’ is the ultimate destination of the human race, the efforts being made to create culturally discordant nations are not leading us there.

The mass migration agenda is designed to bring about the totalitarian enslavement of the human race, run by a Global Elite as portrayed in many dystopian movies and Orwellian novels. To listen to French Green party founder and leader Yves Cochet is to witness a man whose outright betrayal of his own culture is striking. It leads one to really ponder what kinds of benefits he is receiving for holding the position that he does. I’ll let him say it in his own words, taken from this article: I suggest reversing our policy that encourages births, by inverting the logic of benefits payments for families.

The more children you have, the fewer benefits you receive to the point of disappearing entirely after the third birth! “When we accept being ‘Neo-Malthusians,’ we are quickly accused of racism and elitism. For that reason therefore, I make it clear that I am not targeting the poorest countries, which produce more children than others. On the contrary.

The rich countries, like France, are the first that need to decrease demographically.

They are the ones with the most polluting lifestyles. Most of all, limiting our births would allow us to better receive the Muslim migrants who are knocking at our doors. While it is understood that Green Party politicians sometimes espouse the view that having children is the single biggest way a human being can have a negative impact on the environment, Cochet seems to be contradicting himself on his main point by not applying his philosophy on all people for fear of being accused of racism and elitism. And so where this philosophy may contain a germ of sense when broadly applied to humanity, the way in which Cochet is now being selective with it shows that he is choosing to fall in line with an agenda, one that could have dire consequences on our future. Essentially, Cochet is selling out on his own people and is clearly advocating for the erosion and eventual disappearance of the French culture! If these statements are not one of a person who has fully aligned himself with the Global Elite and has probably been promised a junior role within the future ruling class, I don’t know what they are.

The Global Elite is using the current phenomena of higher birth rates in the lesser developed countries, in concert with moving these people within the borders of more prosperous nations, to gain the support of those very people for their globalist agenda. In lock-step with Cochet’s enthusiastic espousal of the breakdown of a nation’s predominant culture, Germany’s Stefanie von Berg addressed the German parliament (see video below) in which she predicts that in 20 to 30 years, the will be no German majorities in Germany’s cities. We will live in a city that thrives on having many different ethnicities, that we have many people and we live in a supercultural society. This is what we will have in the future, and I want to make it very clear, especially towards those right-wingers: this is a good thing! In their arguments in favor of a country that houses people from all different cultures but has lost the will for cultural assimilation, these Green party politicians seemed to have missed one obvious fact: It’s not working. This is clearly evident in Europe, and just a little bit of rational thought and observation would be able to tell you why. I live in Toronto, which is considered to be one of the most successful multicultural cities in the world. By and large, the people here as well as visitors to this city love this and the diversity it introduces to them. But the main reason for its success is that it became multicultural organically, with the arrival of immigrants occurring over time. Being the business center of Canada, more often than not immigrants were attracted to Toronto because they wanted to take advantage of the work and career opportunities. When immigration policies actually go out of their way to accommodate different cultures to speak only their native language, live in their own enclaves, and abide by laws that differ significantly from those followed by the rest of the nation, this creates suspicions of a hidden agenda. Having a city that is not united by language, customs, or codes of ethics makes it difficult for the community as a whole to thrive. While differences are often desirable and are to be respected, and multiculturalism is a beautiful thing, a certain amount of collective cohesion is required for a country to continue to be what made it strong and sovereign to begin with. So as we see the efforts to strip any mandate for assimilation from national immigration policies, we cannot help but think that these efforts are clear attempts to weaken the sovereignty of nations to pave the way for global dictatorship. I believe all people have equal worth, that no one culture is better than another, and that one of our greatest goals should be for all of our cultures to live together on this planet harmoniously with mutual respect for our differences. As such, I am immune to any accusations of racism or xenophobia and I endeavor to speak my mind and tell things the way I see them. I invite all of you in the Awakening Community to speak boldly and forthrightly about matters of conscience, regardless of whether or not it’s ‘politically correct.’ These are the discussions of Conscious Media, which doesn’t put the blame on a given group or position, but rather attempts to shine a light on what is really going on underneath the veils of deception. Only by doing this collectively will the human race be able to navigate towards our chosen and desired destination.

.

Read the full article at the original website