19 Killed as Nepal Free Speech Protests Turn Deadly
The streets of Kathmandu ran with blood yesterday after police opened fire on crowds protesting a nationwide shutdown of almost all social media platforms in Nepal. At least 19 have been confirmed dead with hundreds more injured – many of w
The streets of Kathmandu ran with blood yesterday after police opened fire on crowds protesting a nationwide shutdown of almost all social media platforms in Nepal. At least 19 have been confirmed dead with hundreds more injured – many of whom were students and young people – rallying against a ban that cut off 26 online platforms in a single stroke. In an attempt to keep order, and keep people quiet, live ammunition was used on demonstrators as confirmed by rights groups such as Amnesty. Only after the deaths mounted, and a capital-wide curfew put in place, did ministers reverse the ban. The U-turn restores access, but sends a shocking message to the world about how far governments will go to maintain controls over free speech.
Police Use Live Ammunition on Youth-led Demonstrations
What began as a youth-led march against censorship – following the authorities banning social media platforms like Facebook, Youtube, Instagram, X and others due to “non-registration” – quickly escalated into a deadly stand-off. Protestors marched towards parliament, with police responding by unleashing tear gas, water cannons, batons and even gunfire. Major news outlets reported the fatalities that ensued after the police opened fire, and the current toll of 19 deaths have been confirmed by the authorities. The army was deployed and the capital placed under curfew as the people pushed back on being silenced.
Authorities framed the clampdown and resulting violence as maintaining law and order and have claimed the protests were “infiltrated by vested interests”. But the pictures tell another story: a government sealing off social media platforms, limiting connectivity domestically and internationally, and treating the resulting dissent as a security threat rather than vocal disapproval of the sudden switch.
Kill Switch to Climbdown
Ministers lifted the ban and restored all access to the 26 platforms within hours of the worst violence. The country’s communications minister said, “we have withdrawn the shutdown… they are working now”. The curfew remained, riot police stayed in place, and an inquiry was promised with compensation and free treatment for the injured. Protest leaders, however, refused to stand down, demanding Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s resignation first.
New Delhi expressed sorrow over the deaths and urged immediate dialogue – a sign that the crisis has rippled beyond just domestic optics. Access may well have been reinstated, but the legal on/off switch that enabled the blackout in the first place still exists, ready for whatever is deemed the next “emergency” by authorities. A worrying warning that must be heard by countries looking to implement their own free speech barriers.
Nepal Used the Same Old Playbook: Regulate, then Shutdown
The original ban followed a familiar script: implement regulation, and shutdown when the terms can’t be met. It was required that each social media platform registered locally in the country, appoint compliance officers and set up grievance hotlines, in order to manage “misinformation” and “hate speech” online. When these were inevitably left unmet, the government could declare “non-compliance” and pull the plug, looking like they at least tried acting in favour of public online safety.
The administrative language used masks a sweeping power; the ability to disable online public spaces at will. 26 platforms missed Nepal’s sudden seven-day deadline and were blocked immediately, with access only returned after the death toll entered double figures.
For protestors, censoring these platforms was the spark, not the fuel itself. Crowds chanted to “stop corruption, not social media” and the Hindustan Times pointed at the anger felt towards political class flaunting privilege – “nepo-kid” resentment amongst the masses – with higher class people getting opportunities to prosper while youth unemployment bites. These speech controls became the symbol of a greater demand from the people: accountability from above.
Why this Matters Beyond Nepal
The tragic events that led to 19 deaths must be seen by countries beyond Nepal. This isn’t an issue being faced in just one country. Governments across the world are experimenting with different ways to ensure compliance-by-shutdown, often rewriting platform laws, maintaining an inevitable digital choke-point, and flipping the switch when they feel the time is right. Nepal illustrates the danger of these measures, and the lengths governments can, and have now gone to, to keep “order” when it’s not amicably accepted by their people. For anyone living in freer systems, this should still be a stark warning: when the legal frameworks are put in place, they will be used. Increasingly, the question is about when rather than if.
Timeline: How Deadly Free Speech Events Unfolded
- Seven-day deadline: Government orders all social media platforms to register, many inevitably miss it
- Immediate shutdown: Tens of thousands rally amidst tear gas, water cannons, rubber bullets and live ammunition. 19 dead, hundreds injured, army deployed, and curfew imposed
- Overnight U-turn: Ban lifted, ministers resign, inquiry announced, but curfews remain
What to Look For Next
- Accountability: Will the inquiry name who ordered the platform block, and who approved the use of live rounds on protestors? Will the officials, and the Prime Minister, resign?
- Law repeal: Will the government strip shutdown powers from the registration regime, or simply re-package them for future crises?
- Regional pressure: If force and curfews continue, expect to see stronger signals from neighbours and rights bodies, with India’s statements already suggesting that the greater region is watching
Final Thought
When a state guns down people for defending free speech, the debate stops being about “platform compliance”. These events show us it’s about power, who controls the communication network, and what price the people pay to keep it online. We’ve also seen that pressure works, with the people’s uprising successfully achieving a U-turn, but the very fact that a legal switch exists means the fight isn’t over. A democracy that can unplug its citizens on cue has deeper problems than any press release can fix.
Join the Conversation
Do you think this is the beginning, or the end, of violent and deadly free speech demonstrations worldwide? What do you think happens next in Nepal? Is any of this about online compliance at all, or just control? Share your thoughts below.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Stay Updated!
Stay connected with News updates by Email
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Read the full article at the original website